N96884

Substantial
None

Taylorcraft BC12-D S/N: 9184

Accident Details

Date
Tuesday, July 13, 1999
NTSB Number
CHI99LA241
Location
AITKIN, MN
Event ID
20001212X19200
Coordinates
46.529636, -93.709022
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
None
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
2
Total Aboard
2

Probable Cause and Findings

the right spring in the tailwheel assembly's separation. Factors were the fatigue in the landing gear, the maintenance personnel not identifying the fatigue during the annual inspection, and the right main gear's separation.

Aircraft Information

Registration
Make
TAYLORCRAFT
Serial Number
9184
Engine Type
Reciprocating
Year Built
1946
Model / ICAO
BC12-D TAYB
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Single Engine
No. of Engines
1
Seats
2
FAA Model
BC12-D

Registered Owner (Current)

Name
WALEN DAVID A
Address
38669 W COUNTY LINE RD
City
HILL CITY
State / Zip Code
MN 55748-1594
Country
United States

Analysis

On July 13, 1999, at 1215 central daylight time, a Taylorcraft BC12-D, N96884, sustained substantial damage during a landing on runway 16 (4,018 feet X 75 feet, dry/asphalt) at Aitkin Municipal-Steve Kurtz Field, Aitkin, Minnesota. The commercial rated instructor pilot and dual student reported no injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed during the 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight. The airplane was not on a flight plan. The local flight originated from Aitkin Municipal-Steve Kurtz Field Airport at 1200 and was practicing touch and goes at the time of the accident.

At 1157, the Aitkin Municipal-Steve Kurtz Field observation was: Wind calm; visibility 10 statute miles; sky condition clear; temperature 24 degrees C; dew point 22 degrees C; altimeter 29.81 inches of mercury.

In his written statement the student pilot said, "We completed one [touch and go] and had landed on the second and were in the roll out. The aircraft had decellerated to 10-15 mph. The handling of the aircraft became ineffective and attempts to control the aircraft were to no avail. The aircraft was veering to the left." The pilot stated that the instructor said "... to use the rudder." The student stated, "I replied I had and he said to use the brakes. I firmly applied the heel brakes and the aircraft suddenly careened to the left of the runway." The student said, "Near the edge of the runway the aircraft began to skip and tipped to the right. It came to rest off the left side of the runway, right wing down with the tail still on the runway. The right wing had dragged the last 6-8 foot on the runway. The landing gears and the wheel had gouged the asphalt in a scored pattern as it skipped across it. The prop had struck twice in the dirt alongside the runway. I don't recall where the wheel was other than that it was separted from the aircraft and lying on the runway." The student said that the right spring on the tail wheel was found detached.

An annual inspection of the accident airplane was completed on May 25, 1999. See appended inspection checklist. The airplane accumulated nine hours of flight time since the annual inspection.

The axle was sent to the National Transportation Safety Board's Materials Laboratory for examination. The axle's surfaces were examined with an optical microscope. An excerpt from the laboratory's report states, "The circumferential portion of the fracture surface was located on the inboard side of the circular plate at the top of the axle and had a dark brown and rubbed appearance, indicative of a crack that has been in existence for an extended time. This portion of the fracture was directly adjacent to the circular plate, through either the weld of heat affected zone adjacent to the weld between the upper struts and the circular plate. The circumferential portion of the fracture contained what appeared to be a wide but shallow crack arrest position, suggestive of crack initiation from a wide area approximately in the center of this portion of the fracture." See appended Materials Laboratory Factual Report No. 00-016.

The student pilot's safety recommendation states, "The crack in the axle was tucked within the brake cylinder. The only way to inspect it would be removal of the wheel & brake assembly."

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# CHI99LA241