N726CB

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On September 16, 2009, about 1215 Pacific daylight time, a Raytheon Aircraft Company B200, N726CB, sustained substantial damage after impacting terrain while maneuvering during initial climb at the Hayward Executive Airport (HWD), Hayward, California. The commercial pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight, which was operated in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, and no flight plan was filed. The flight was originating at the time of the accident, with its destination being the San Carlos Airport (SQL), San Carlos, California.

In a report submitted to the Safety Board investigator-in-charge (IIC), the pilot reported that this was the first flight after maintenance had been performed on the airplane. The pilot stated that during the takeoff roll on runway 28R there were no warning lights when he started down the runway and that both engines were delivering full power. The pilot further stated, “…after the takeoff the airplane started drifting left. I applied right aileron and right rudder. I was still drifting left and had full right aileron. I landed at the edge of the airport.”

In a personal interview conducted by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) aviation safety inspector, the pilot revealed that when he was 100 feet off the ground the airplane started to veer to the left, and that the airspeed was between 95 and 100 [knots]. The pilot stated that he then “kicked in ‘hard’ right rudder,” and at this point the engine power seemed normal. The pilot added that he had both hands on the yoke until the airplane crashed. The inspector reported that when asked about the use of the airplane’s checklist, the pilot stated, “Yes, but during taxi.”

A FAA inspector who responded to and examined the accident site reported that the airplane initially struck an industrial building (off airport property) near the top of the structure with its left main landing gear [tire], and that the tire mark was between 20 feet to 30 feet in length. The inspector stated that wing parts were also located on top of the building. The inspector added that a second industrial building, which was located about 40 feet to 50 feet west of the first building, was also struck by the airplane. The inspector reported that it appeared that the aircraft was "riding" along the top edge of the building with the left engine striking the top side of the building. The right wing was low, and a collision occurred with the right main [landing] gear against a railroad car parked immediately beside the building. The inspector stated that this collision turned the aircraft 360 degrees, almost immediately causing the aircraft to slide off the end of the railroad car. The inspector added that the “tail-first flight” ended with the aircraft sliding backwards on [the] railroad tracks until it came to an abrupt stop.

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

A review of FAA records revealed the 37 year old pilot possessed a commercial pilot certificate for airplane land, instrument airplane, rotorcraft-helicopter, and a private pilot certificate for airplane single-engine land. The pilot’s most recent second-class FAA airman medical certificate was issued on October 22, 2009, without limitations. The pilot revealed that his most recent biennial flight review was conducted on February 24, 2009 in a King Air B200 airplane. The pilot reported a total flight time of 2,913 hours, of which 1,707 hours were in the same make and model as the accident airplane.

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

The airplane was a 2001 Raytheon Aircraft Company B200, serial number BB-1750, which had accumulated a total engine and airframe time of 1,229.6 hours at the time of the accident. The airplane underwent its most recent Continuous Airworthiness inspection on September 10, 2009. The accident flight was the first flight subsequent to the completion of this inspection.

In a telephone conversation with the IIC, the service manager of Mather Aviation, LLC, of Hayward, California, the firm that performed the most recent maintenance on the accident airplane, the maintenance work performed on the airplane was described as “routine maintenance.” The service manager added that the airplane was not brought into their facility because of “some other problem” that had just recently occurred. When asked by the IIC if he could recall anyone having repositioned any of the airplane’s trim controls while maintenance was being performed on the airplane, he replied that the trim controls were never touched by any of his maintenance personnel who worked on the airplane. The service manager stated that the trim controls were in the same position when the airplane was returned to the owner as they were when it was delivered to their facility for maintenance.

As part of the most recent maintenance that was performed on the airplane, the service manager reported that a 1,200 hour throttle stop pin inspection (throttle catch gate) was performed. In a statement provided by Mather Aviation’s Director of Quality Assurance, the inspection was accomplished by an alternate means than is described in the Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Super King Air 200 Series Maintenance Manual, Chapter 76-00-00, page 211. The Director of Quality Assurance stated, “It is Mather Aviation policy to not disturb fight controls for access to areas to be inspected, unless no other means of access is available. In this case (power lever stop pin wear inspection) it is our practice to use a boroscope through the throttle lever arm cutouts on the pedestal. This affords a better view of the pin and provides a better view of the contact area to gauge the wear than by visual reference with the flashlight and mirror after opening the pedestal side panel and disturbing the trim wheel and rigging as is described in the maintenance manual.”

According to the Hawker Beechcraft maintenance manual, the description for the inspection of the power lever detent pin is as follows:

a. Disconnect all electrical power.

b. Remove the pilot’s seat assembly from the airplane.

c. Remove the screw and washer that secure both the elevator trim tab control wheel and the left end of the engine control lever pivot shaft to the left side of the pedestal. Index the position of the elevator trim tab control wheel for later installation.

d. Remove the upholstery panel from the left side of the pedestal.

e. Using a mirror and flashlight, inspect the upper power lever detent pin (Ref. Figure 206) on each power lever for excessive wear in the groove where the detent pin travels on the idle/reverse stop assembly between the levers. Wear of the pin’s diameter by a 1/3 or more is considered excessive.

f. If excessive wear of the pin is indicated, the power lever assembly must be replaced as follows:

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION

At 1154, about 21 minutes prior to the accident, the HWD Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS), reported wind 290 degrees at 7 knots, visibility 10 miles, sky clear, temperature 21 degrees Celsius (C), dew point 14 degrees C, and an altimeter setting of 30.08 inches of Mercury.

At 1236, about 21 minutes after the accident, the HWD ASOS issued a Special weather observation, which reported wind 290 degrees at 7 knots, visibility 4 miles in haze, few clouds at 900 feet, temperature 20 degrees C, dew point 14 degrees C, and an altimeter setting of 30.08 inches of Mercury.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

An on-scene inspection of the wreckage by FAA aviation safety inspectors revealed that the airplane came to rest on a set of industrial railroad tracks, with the airplane’s fuselage oriented on a 45-degree angle across the tracks and on a magnetic heading of about 150 degrees. The tail section of the airplane, which remained intact, came to rest up against the airport’s sound boundary fence, with a partial section of the metal fence separated from the support fence posts. The main wreckage was located about 4,420 feet from the point of the initial takeoff roll on a magnetic heading of about 292 degrees, and about 520 feet southwest of the runway 10R displaced threshold, on a magnetic heading of about 228 degrees.

An examination of the wreckage site revealed that the entire right side and forward left side of the airplane sustained extensive thermal damage. Both engines, the nose gear and right main landing gear had separated, while the empennage and both wings remained attached to the airplane’s fuselage at all attach points. The nose cone of the airplane sustained severe impact damage.

Industrial buildings adjacent to and south of the debris path exhibited impact signatures consistent with that of the accident airplane. Fragmented parts of the airplane were located throughout the area, including on the roofs of the adjacent buildings. A park railroad car exhibited impact signatures, which was evidenced by 2 tire marks on the east end of the car’s upper right side.

A defined burn area extended to the northwest and parallel to and south of taxiway Zebra, measuring about 745 feet in length and about 120 feet in width.

TESTS AND RESEARCH

Airframe Examination

On September 22, 2009, a Safety Board air safety investigator, a FAA aviation safety inspector, and a Hawker Beechcraft Corporation air safety investigator conducted a detailed examination of the airframe. The examination revealed that the fuselage was intact and exhibited thermal damage to the right side of the fuselage. Additional thermal damage was observed on the left side of the fuselage over the wing area. The nose gear assembly was separated from the airframe. The avionics bay exhibited impact and thermal damage. The radar dome was separated. The forward cockpit windows exhibited thermal discoloration. A majority of the cabin area windows were melted and thermally damaged. Flight control continuity was established from the cockpit controls to the left and right wing roots, and aft ...