N624SW

Substantial
None

BOEING 737-3H4S/N: 27934

Accident Details

Date
Saturday, April 10, 2010
NTSB Number
WPR10FA199
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Event ID
20100410X34740
Coordinates
33.946666, -118.400276
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
None
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
109
Total Aboard
109

Probable Cause and Findings

The tug operator’s failure to comply with company procedures when parking an unoccupied baggage tug, and the failure of the tug’s seat switch to disengage the electric motor when weight was removed from the driver’s seat.

Aircraft Information

Registration
N624SW
Make
BOEING
Serial Number
27934
Year Built
1996
Model / ICAO
737-3H4

Registered Owner (Historical)

Name
AEROTHRUST HOLDINGS LEASING LLC
Address
PO BOX 522236
Status
Deregistered
City
MIAMI
State / Zip Code
FL 33152-2236
Country
United States

Analysis

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On April 9, 2010, about 1930 Pacific daylight time, a Boeing 737-3H4, N624SW, sustained substantial damage when it was struck by a runaway baggage tug at the Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, California. At the time, the airplane had one engine operating and was being pushed back for its flight by a pushback tug. None of the 2 airline transport pilots, the 3 flight attendants, or the 104 passengers were injured. There were no reported ground injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by Southwest Airlines as flight number 579, under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed. The scheduled domestic passenger flight had a planned destination of the Tucson International Airport, Tucson, Arizona.

In a written statement, an airline ground service employee reported he drove a baggage tug close to gate 3, terminal 1, whereupon he exited the tug with the gear selector in forward and without setting the parking brake or turning off its electric motor. The employee reported he then walked around the tug to pick up two bags that were placed on the ramp. He picked up one of the bags and placed it on the passenger's seat of the unoccupied tug.

As the employee was handling the second bag, he observed that the tug had started to move and was traveling in the direction of a hydrant fueling cart that was parked between gates 3 and 5. The ground service employee ran after the tug to get aboard it and attempt to stop its movement. He attempted to apply the brakes but had to exit the tug before it impacted the airplane. He stated that prior to exiting the tug, he noticed that the first bag he had placed on the tug was on the floor and likely resting on the accelerator pedal. The company issued a Safety Advisory (SA 10-06) on the accident that stated that the bag fell off the seat and onto the tug’s accelerator.

Ground service employees located on the ramp near gate 3 stated that, initially, the tug rolled forward about 30 feet until it struck a hydrant fueling cart. The runaway tug veered off the side of the cart and continued rolling about 130 feet until it impacted the airplane’s number 1 engine. Subsequently, the tug impacted the left, lower side of the airplane's fuselage and belly, and proceeded beneath the airplane and came to a stop upon impacting the number 2 engine.

DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT

Examination of the airplane by maintenance personnel revealed that the fuselage exhibited various skin punctures, dents and an internal frame shear tie was bent. The number 1 engine sustained damage to its cowl. The number 2 engine sustained damage to the engine, engine components, engine cowl and the engine pylon (including wing fairings, pylon structure, and mid-spar fitting to under wing fitting fuse pins).

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The 47 year-old tug operator was on his first day back to work following an extended leave of about 2 months. He has been employed with the company for about 7 ½ years. He received his initial Powered Industrial Truck Training (PITT) on December 13, 2006, and his three year refresher PITT training was completed on October 16, 2009.

TESTS AND RESEARCH

Examination of the tug by a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator revealed that the seat switch was inoperative. According to the tug operator’s guide, when weight is removed from the driver's seat, the seat switch is designed to open the electric circuit thereby disengaging the tug's electrical motor. The weight activated switch is located beneath the driver's seat. Post-accident testing revealed that the tug would not move while pushing down on the accelerator pedal if the parking brake was set or the brakes applied, or with the directional control level in the neutral position.

The company ground equipment general driving rules require unoccupied vehicles on the ramp to be placed in park or neutral, with the parking brake set and the engine turned off.

The company ground equipment general driving rules has a caution which states never to transport any items (e.g., baggage, freight) on top of or in the passenger seating area of a vehicle.

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# WPR10FA199