N903SR

Substantial
Minor

CIRRUS DESIGN CORP SR22S/N: 2465

Accident Details

Date
Thursday, January 9, 2014
NTSB Number
WPR14FA091
Location
Pocatello, ID
Event ID
20140109X92051
Coordinates
42.860023, -112.630630
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
Minor
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
2
Uninjured
0
Total Aboard
2

Probable Cause and Findings

The distributor gear teeth failure of the right magneto that resulted in severe engine vibration and partial loss of engine power, which progressively led to the failure of the left magneto distributor drive gear teeth. Contributing to the airplane’s continued operation with the partial loss of engine power was the pilot’s failure to execute all steps in the engine partial power loss procedure.

Aircraft Information

Registration
N903SR
Make
CIRRUS DESIGN CORP
Serial Number
2465
Engine Type
Reciprocating
Year Built
2007
Model / ICAO
SR22SR22
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Single Engine
No. of Engines
1

Registered Owner (Historical)

Name
NYLUND IMPORTS INC
Address
5545 N LARIAT DR
Status
Deregistered
City
CASTLE ROCK
State / Zip Code
CO 80108-9359
Country
United States

Analysis

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn January 9, 2014, at 1515 mountain standard time, a Cirrus Design Corp SR22, N903SR, experienced severe engine vibrations and a partial loss of engine power during cruise flight near Pocatello, Idaho. The pilot executed a forced landing utilizing the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS). The private pilot and single passenger received minor injuries, and the airplane was substantially damaged. The airplane was registered to, and operated by, Nylund Imports Incorporated, under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight, which operated on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan. The flight originated from Centennial Airport, Denver, Colorado, at 1153, and was destined for Sun Valley, Idaho.

The pilot reported that while passing Pocatello at 17,000 feet mean sea level (msl), the engine suddenly started vibrating severely in conjunction with a partial loss of power. He declared an emergency and Salt Lake Center provided vectors to the final approach course for the Pocatello instrument landing system (ILS) RWY 21 approach. The pilot stated that the vibrations increased in severity and available engine power was decreasing. The pilot adjusted the mixture and throttle to no effect. He did not switch between the two magnetos because he didn't want to risk losing engine power completely. After descending through the 2,000-foot broken cloud layer on the ILS approach, engine instruments indicated that only 20% power was being produced, and he determined that the airplane was not going to make it to the runway. At 1,000 feet above ground level (agl) he shut down the engine and deployed the Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS), which brought the airplane down into an open field. He and his passenger rapidly egressed before the airplane was dragged away by the parachute in a 30-knot wind. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot, age 58, held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land, multi-engine land, and instrument airplane issued December 28, 2003, and a third-class medical certificate issued January 30, 2012, with the limitation that he must have glasses available for near vision. The pilot reported having 2,159 total flight hours, with 2,046 hours in the accident airplane make and model, and 42 hours with in the previous 90 days. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe four-seat, low-wing, fixed-gear airplane, serial number 2465, was manufactured in 2007. It was powered by a Continental Motors IO-550-N46B, 310-hp engine that had been modified with Tornado Alley turbonormalizing system by Cirrus and equipped with Hartzell model PHC-J3YFIN, 3-bladed composite constant speed propeller. Review of the airplane maintenance records show that an annual inspection was performed on December 13, 2013, at a total airframe and engine time of 850.3 hours. On September 2, 2010, at 496.2 engine hours, both magnetos were overhauled, and reinstalled on the engine.

Engine Failure Procedures

The SR22 Pilot Operating Handbook, Section 3, Emergency Procedures, dictate the following for Engine Partial Power Loss.

"The following procedure provides guidance to isolate and correct some of the conditions contributing to a rough running engine of a partial power loss:

1. Air Conditioner – OFF

2. Fuel Pump – BOOST

Selecting BOOST on may clear the problem if vapor in the injection lines is the problem or if the engine-driven fuel pump has partially failed. The electric fuel pump will not provide sufficient fuel pressure to supply the engine if the engine-driven fuel pump completely fails.

3. Fuel Selector – SWITCH TANKS

Selecting the opposite fuel tank may resolve the problem if fuel starvation or contamination in one tank was the problem.

4. Mixture - CHECK appropriate for flight conditions

5. Power Lever – SWEEP. Sweep the Power Lever through the range as required to obtain smooth operation and required power.

6. Alternate Induction Air – ON

7. Ignition Switch – BOTH, L, then R. Cycling the ignition switch momentarily from BOTH to L and then R may help identify the problem. An obvious power loss in single ignition operation indicates magneto or spark plug trouble. If engine does not smooth out in several minutes, try a richer mixture setting. Return ignition to BOTH positions unless extreme roughness dictates the use of a single magneto.

8. Land as soon as practical." AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe four-seat, low-wing, fixed-gear airplane, serial number 2465, was manufactured in 2007. It was powered by a Continental Motors IO-550-N46B, 310-hp engine that had been modified with Tornado Alley turbonormalizing system by Cirrus and equipped with Hartzell model PHC-J3YFIN, 3-bladed composite constant speed propeller. Review of the airplane maintenance records show that an annual inspection was performed on December 13, 2013, at a total airframe and engine time of 850.3 hours. On September 2, 2010, at 496.2 engine hours, both magnetos were overhauled, and reinstalled on the engine.

Engine Failure Procedures

The SR22 Pilot Operating Handbook, Section 3, Emergency Procedures, dictate the following for Engine Partial Power Loss.

"The following procedure provides guidance to isolate and correct some of the conditions contributing to a rough running engine of a partial power loss:

1. Air Conditioner – OFF

2. Fuel Pump – BOOST

Selecting BOOST on may clear the problem if vapor in the injection lines is the problem or if the engine-driven fuel pump has partially failed. The electric fuel pump will not provide sufficient fuel pressure to supply the engine if the engine-driven fuel pump completely fails.

3. Fuel Selector – SWITCH TANKS

Selecting the opposite fuel tank may resolve the problem if fuel starvation or contamination in one tank was the problem.

4. Mixture - CHECK appropriate for flight conditions

5. Power Lever – SWEEP. Sweep the Power Lever through the range as required to obtain smooth operation and required power.

6. Alternate Induction Air – ON

7. Ignition Switch – BOTH, L, then R. Cycling the ignition switch momentarily from BOTH to L and then R may help identify the problem. An obvious power loss in single ignition operation indicates magneto or spark plug trouble. If engine does not smooth out in several minutes, try a richer mixture setting. Return ignition to BOTH positions unless extreme roughness dictates the use of a single magneto.

8. Land as soon as practical." TESTS AND RESEARCHPrimary Flight Display and Multi-Function Display Data

The Primary Flight Display (PFD) unit includes a solid state Air Data and Attitude Heading Reference System (ADAHRS) and displays aircraft flight data including altitude, airspeed, attitude, vertical speed, and heading. The PFD unit has external pitot-static inputs for altitude, airspeed, and vertical speed information. Each PFD contains two flash memory devices mounted on a riser card. The flash memory stores information the PFD unit uses to generate the various PFD displays. Additionally, the PFD has a data logging function which is used by the manufacturer for maintenance and diagnostics.

The Multi-Function Display (MFD) unit is able to display checklists, terrain/map information, approach chart information, and other aircraft/operational information depending on the specific configuration and options that are installed. One of the options available is a display of comprehensive engine monitoring and performance data.

Based on the data downloaded from the PFD & MFD the following event timeline was established.

Time(approx) Elapsed Time Event

11:44:24 0:00 Engine Start

11:53:06 0:08:42 Take Off

14:38:30 2:54:06 Pressure alt starts to decrease (descent starts)

14:41:18 2:56:54 RPM starts to decrease/fluctuate

14:42:00 2:57:36 Increase fuel flow - pilot manipulates the mixture, then manipulates the throttle indicated by RPM changes

14:42:24 2:58:00 CHT* in No. 6 Cyl starts to trend upward

14:44:12 2:59:42 CHT in No. 6 Cyl Peaks 331° F

14:47:00 3:02:36 CHT No. 6 decreases to ~280°F

14:51:00 3:06:36 CHT No. 6 starts to trend upward ~248°F

14:52:18 3:07:54 CHT No. 3 starts to trend upward ~250°F

14:56:30 3:12:06 CHT No. 3 increases above the average peaking at~315°F

14:58:00 3:13:36 EGT** 2,4,5,6, drop off. EGT 1 & 3 increase.

* CHT- cylinder head temperature

**EGT - exhaust gas temperature

The full data download and NTSB Vehicle Recorders Laboratory report are located in the official docket of this investigation.

Engine Examination

On April 15, 2014, the engine was examined at Continental Motors, Inc, under the supervision of the NTSB investigator-in-charge (IIC) with technical representatives from Continental Motors, Cirrus Aircraft, and Tornado Alley.

The engine was removed from the shipping crate and placed on an engine stand for examination. The turbochargers and associated hardware had been removed and placed in the shipping container for shipping. The engine was visually examined and the crankshaft was rotated to verify engine drive train continuity. During the crankshaft rotation both magneto drives were observed through the pressurization port on the magneto housing. Both distributor gears were not moving in either magneto during the crankshaft rotation. The engine driven magneto metal drive gear interfaces with the light weight nylon composite distributor gear during operation. It was noted that the No. 3 ignition leads were producing a spark after the No. 1 ignition leads, indicating an improper firing order. The magnetos were removed for further examination. Examination of the magneto di...

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# WPR14FA091