N60RW

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn May 16, 2016, about 0835 central daylight time, a Beech A36TC, N60RW, impacted terrain in Tupelo, Mississippi. The airline transport pilot and three passengers sustained fatal injuries, and the airplane was destroyed by postcrash fire. The flight was being operated as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the airport, and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the flight that originated at Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP), Tupelo, Mississippi, about 0830, and was destined for Charlottesville-Albemarle Airport (CHO), Charlottesville, Virginia.

According to air traffic control recordings, shortly after departing runway 36, the pilot advised the tower controller that there was smoke in the cockpit and that he needed to return to the airport. One witness reported seeing something fall from the airplane as it departed. Several witnesses reported that the airplane made a left, westbound turn toward the airport, at an altitude of about 500-1,000 feet above ground and then turned back toward the approach end of runway 18 while descending. Two witnesses reported seeing the airplane about 50 ft above them with smoke and flames coming from the bottom, left side of the airplane before it impacted terrain. Shortly after the accident, TUP personnel conducted a sweep of the runway and found the exhaust tailpipe and a fractured v-band coupling. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate and a flight instructor certificate with airplane single-engine land, multiengine land, and instrument airplane ratings. His most recent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) third-class medical certificate was issued on October 24, 2014, with the limitation that he "must wear lenses for distant and have glasses for near vision." At the time of his last medical evaluation, the pilot reported 5,675 total flight hours. The pilot's logbooks were not available for review, and his total flight experience at the time of the accident could not be determined. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe six-seat, low-wing, retractable tricycle-gear airplane was manufactured in 1980. It was powered by a Continental TSIO-520-UB series, 300-horsepower engine and was equipped with a McCauley three-blade, constant-speed propeller.

A review of maintenance records revealed that the airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on April 19, 2016. At that time, the airplane had accumulated 2,037 total flight hours. At the time of the annual inspection, the engine had accumulated 242.1 hours since an overhaul completed on December 26, 2012. The exhaust system was not specifically mentioned in the logbook entries for the overhaul or engine reinstallation.

The airplane accumulated 58.6 hours over the 12 months that preceded the April 19, 2016 inspection. The exhaust system, v-band coupling, and exhaust tailpipe support clamp were not specifically discussed in the logbook entries for the annual inspection; therefore, it could not be determined when the coupling and support clamp were last inspected. Due to thermal damage to the cockpit, the airframe and engine total time could not be determined.

The Continental Aircraft Engine Maintenance Manual required a visual inspection at every 100-hour and annual inspection to "Inspect the physical integrity of the turbocharger and exhaust system. Inspect multi-segment v-band clamp spot welds (or rivets) for cracks or physical damage. Inspect the corner radii of the clamp inner segments for cracks with a flashlight and inspection mirror. Inspect the v-band clamp outer band for flatness, especially within two inches of spot-weld tabs that retain the T-bold fastener variance must be less than 0.062 in." The turbocharger and exhaust system inspection portion of the 100-hour inspection criteria stated, "Verify 100% inner and outer band segment contact." The instructions were accompanied by a diagram of the required v-band clamp inspection and instructions for cleaning the v-band clamp.

The preflight checklist did not include an inspection of the exhaust system. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONThe 0847 weather conditions reported at TUP, located about 2 nautical miles south of the accident site, included wind from 130° at 9 knots, 10 statute miles visibility, temperature 19°C, dew point 5°C, and altimeter setting of 30.17 inches of mercury. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe six-seat, low-wing, retractable tricycle-gear airplane was manufactured in 1980. It was powered by a Continental TSIO-520-UB series, 300-horsepower engine and was equipped with a McCauley three-blade, constant-speed propeller.

A review of maintenance records revealed that the airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on April 19, 2016. At that time, the airplane had accumulated 2,037 total flight hours. At the time of the annual inspection, the engine had accumulated 242.1 hours since an overhaul completed on December 26, 2012. The exhaust system was not specifically mentioned in the logbook entries for the overhaul or engine reinstallation.

The airplane accumulated 58.6 hours over the 12 months that preceded the April 19, 2016 inspection. The exhaust system, v-band coupling, and exhaust tailpipe support clamp were not specifically discussed in the logbook entries for the annual inspection; therefore, it could not be determined when the coupling and support clamp were last inspected. Due to thermal damage to the cockpit, the airframe and engine total time could not be determined.

The Continental Aircraft Engine Maintenance Manual required a visual inspection at every 100-hour and annual inspection to "Inspect the physical integrity of the turbocharger and exhaust system. Inspect multi-segment v-band clamp spot welds (or rivets) for cracks or physical damage. Inspect the corner radii of the clamp inner segments for cracks with a flashlight and inspection mirror. Inspect the v-band clamp outer band for flatness, especially within two inches of spot-weld tabs that retain the T-bold fastener variance must be less than 0.062 in." The turbocharger and exhaust system inspection portion of the 100-hour inspection criteria stated, "Verify 100% inner and outer band segment contact." The instructions were accompanied by a diagram of the required v-band clamp inspection and instructions for cleaning the v-band clamp.

The preflight checklist did not include an inspection of the exhaust system. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe wreckage, which was mostly consumed by fire, was located on flat terrain with trees nearby. Tree cuts, which began about 50 ft above the terrain, descended in about a 20° angle for about 165 ft along a magnetic heading of 110°.

All flight controls surfaces were accounted for at the accident site, and flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit to their respective control inputs. The outboard portion of the right wing was found about 80 ft past the initial tree strike; it was separated from the airframe and heavily burned. The right aileron remained attached, but the right flap was separated. The left wing remained attached at the forward spar but sustained extensive fire damage.

One of the three propeller blades exhibited S-bending, leading edge gouging, and chordwise scratches. The second blade exhibited tip curling and aft bending. The third blade displayed aft bending and minor chordwise scratches.

The engine exhaust pipe was missing from the exhaust side of the turbocharger. A subsequent examination of the engine at a recovery facility did not reveal any other preexisting mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Thumb compression was obtained on all cylinders, and continuity was confirmed throughout the drive train. The magnetos were removed and rotated, and a spark was observed at each of their respective terminal leads.

The exhaust tailpipe was separated at the exhaust flange of the turbocharger. The exhaust tailpipe flange was crushed, consistent with it impacting the runway. The separated v-band coupling, which is intended to attach the tailpipe to the turbocharger, was attached at the ends by a bolt and safety wire but was fractured through its band. The tailpipe support clamp, which is intended to hold the tailpipe to a bracket that is attached to the engine for support, was missing/not attached to the support clamp bracket, and it was not located in the wreckage or on the runway. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONA v-band coupling is a common way of attaching portions of an exhaust system and are widely used throughout the aviation industry on reciprocating turbocharged engines. V-band couplings are exposed to extremely high exhaust temperatures and heat cycles. High temperatures and corrosive conditions can lead to cracks and failures of the couplings, which result in hot exhaust gases escaping the exhaust system and subsequently can result in smoke in the cockpit, in-flight fires, and fatal accidents.

Since the mid-70s, v-band coupling failures have resulted in a significant number of nonfatal and fatal incidents and accidents involving both fixed-wing aircraft and rotorcraft. Since 1974, NTSB accident and incident investigations have led to the development and issuance of at least seven NTSB safety recommendations concerning exhaust systems and/or exhaust v-band coupling/clamps. In response, the FAA has issued 20 aircraft-model-specific airworthiness directives (AD) in which v-band coupling/clamps were included, six of which were v-band specific. In 1979, the FAA issued the first AD that was aircraft make and model specific. The AD required the inspection of, and provided replacement intervals for, v-band couplings. However, there are many airplanes and helicopters, including the accident airplane, equipped with v-band couplings susceptible to fractures and failure that were not covered by the AD. In 2001, the FAA issued AD 2001-08-08 for Beech A36 airplanes with the Torna...