N255BZ

Substantial
None

PAUL R SEIPT SONEXS/N: 0255

Accident Details

Date
Saturday, June 3, 2017
NTSB Number
WPR17LA119
Location
Garfield, WA
Event ID
20170604X50503
Coordinates
46.991390, -117.127220
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
None
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
1
Total Aboard
1

Probable Cause and Findings

The pilot’s improper torque of screws that attached the flywheel mounting flange to the crankshaft during engine assembly, which resulted in heavy vibrations and the subsequent in-flight loss of the propeller.

Aircraft Information

Registration
N255BZ
Make
PAUL R SEIPT
Serial Number
0255
Engine Type
Reciprocating
Year Built
2016
Model / ICAO
SONEXBPAT
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Single Engine
No. of Engines
1

Registered Owner (Historical)

Name
SEIPT PAUL R
Address
232 SOMERSET ST
Status
Deregistered
City
RICHLAND
State / Zip Code
WA 99354-1964
Country
United States

Analysis

On June 3, 2017, about 1130 Pacific daylight time, an experimental, amateur-built Sonex, N255BZ, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Garfield, WA. The private pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

The pilot, who was also the builder of the airplane, reported that, during cruise flight at 4,000 ft mean sea level, he experienced an increasing vibration followed by a loud bang. He subsequently saw the propeller separate from the airplane and he performed a forced landing to a paved road. During the landing roll, the airplane impacted a power pole guy wire, resulting in substantial damage to the left wing (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Accident site.

Examination of the airplane revealed that the propeller assembly and forward section of the crankshaft separated from the engine. The propeller and separated crankshaft section were not located.

An examination of the engine crankcase and crankshaft was conducted at the aircraft manufacturer. The crankshaft separation surface was located at the forward main bearing journal and exhibited beach marks propagating from the woodruff key slot and extending through most of the separated surface area. (see Figure 2.) The flywheel mounting flange attached to the crankshaft and the flywheel mating surface showed material deformation at several screw holes, and two fractured screw shafts remained in their holes in the mount. (see Figure 3.) A 1/4-inch area of fretting was also noted around the outer circumference of the mounting flange and flywheel mating area. The trigger shaft, which is attached to the flywheel, displayed scuffing and material deformation at the locations of the flywheel mounting screw heads.

Figure 2. Crankshaft separation surface area.

Figure 3. Flywheel mounting flange.

The pilot reported that he found no torque values in the manufacturer’s assembly manual during assembly of the flywheel. He was uncertain of the torque that he applied to the screws, although he thought that it was sufficient. The pilot further reported that it is his common practice to apply Loctite to all critical fasteners, and he could not specifically remember adding it to the fasteners during the assembly. According to the AeroVee 2.0 Assembly Manual, the trigger shaft is installed on the flywheel with four screws and Loctite 242 applied to the screw threads. No torque value is stated in this step. The flywheel and flywheel mounting flange are preassembled for the engine kit.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular 43-13-1B Table 7-1 shows the recommended torque to be used for a specified fastener. Builders can also contact the manufacturer, who can supply them with a general torque table. The maintenance history of the airplane was not obtained during the investigation.

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# WPR17LA119