C-GYGY

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn February 22, 2018, about 1056 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-32R-300 airplane, Canadian registry C-GYGY, was destroyed when it impacted terrain near Monticello, Utah. The private pilot and the three passengers were fatally injured. The airplane was privately owned and was being operated by the pilot as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. Undetermined meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan was filed for the flight. The airplane departed Grand Junction Airport (GJT), Grand Junction, Colorado, about 0937 for an undetermined destination.

The pilot and passengers were all Canadian citizens and resided in the province of Alberta. According to the pilot's daughter, on a return trip from the US to Alberta in the airplane in early February, the pilot left the airplane at Cut Bank International Airport (CTB), Cut Bank, Montana, reportedly because adverse weather prevented completion of the trip. The airplane remained hangered at CTB until February 21, when the pilot and passengers drove to CTB to begin the flight journey that would include the accident leg.

The pilot's daughter reported that the pilot and passengers had planned to fly from CTB to Albuquerque, New Mexico, on February 21, to allow the pilot to examine an airplane for possible purchase. She was not aware of any planned stops. She reported that the airplane departed CTB about 1000. However, due to weather, the flight landed at GJT, and the group overnighted in the local area. According to fixed base operator personnel at GJT, the airplane arrived about 1605 on February 21. Family members of the pilot and passengers were not aware of any intermediate stops between CTB and GJT, but they would not necessarily be aware of any such stops.

The direct line distance between CTB and Albuquerque was about 853 nautical miles (nm). The direct line distance from CTB to GJT was about 592 nm, and the direct line distance from GJT to Albuquerque was about 262 nm. Albuquerque is south-southeast of GJT. (See figure 1.)

Figure 1 - Trip Cities

According to GJT air traffic control tower information, on February 22, the airplane departed on the accident flight to the northeast. No further communications between the airplane and any air traffic control or other ground facilities were located.

Review of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ground-based radar data revealed a track from an unidentified aircraft broadcasting on the visual flight rules transponder code of 1200 appeared to be that of the accident airplane. The first radar return was received at 1004:04 about 16 nm west-northwest of GJT, at a radar-indicated altitude of 7,900 ft. The track was oriented towards the southwest, on a course of about 237° true. The airplane remained level at 7,900 ft until about 1005, when it began a climb to 8,500 ft, and then remained at that altitude until about 1015.

About 1015 the airplane began a climb to about 10,200 ft, where it leveled off. About 1017, the track turned to a course of about 189°, and remained there for about 9 minutes. About 1026, the track turned to the south-southeast, onto a course of about 157°. About 1031, the airplane began a descent of about 150 fpm, and about the same time, the track turned to the south, to a new course of about 173°. The final radar return was received at 1033:34. That return was located about 35 mile north-northwest of the accident site, at a radar-indicated altitude of 9,200 ft.

The approximate floor of radar system coverage in the area between the final radar return and the accident site was about 9,500 ft, and underlying terrain elevations were generally about 7,000 ft. This provided the airplane with a few thousand feet of altitude in which to fly while remaining below the radar coverage floor. Calculations using a nominal airplane cruise speed of 140 knots and a southerly wind of about 20 knots indicate that the airplane would have traveled about 53 nm in the time between the final radar return and the accident. This is about 22 nm more than the straight-line distance between the final radar return and the accident site. (see Figure 2 and Figure 3)

Figure 2 - Radar Track

Figure 3 - Radar Altitude

About 2200 on February 22, in response to a concerned party, the FAA issued an Alert Notice stating that the airplane was overdue. About 0215 on February 23, the US Air Force Rescue Coordination Center (AFRCC) reported that a 121.5 MHz emergency locator transmitter signal had been detected in the vicinity of La Sal Junction, Utah. Multiple ground and airborne searches were initiated that day, and at 1649, the airplane wreckage was located by a Civil Air Patrol search aircraft. Law enforcement personnel arrived at the scene soon thereafter, and the wreckage was confirmed to be that of the missing airplane. The wreckage was examined on scene by FAA, Piper, and NTSB personnel on February 26. The wreckage was recovered on February 27 for transport to, and subsequent detailed examination at, a secure facility. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONThe pilot held a Transport Canada (TC) private pilot license. According to a TC explanatory letter, the pilot's "license is endorsed with a blanket type rating for All Single Pilot Non-High-Performance Single Engine Land Aeroplanes." Subsequent communication from TC indicated that a high-performance airplane was defined as "an aeroplane that is specified in the minimum flight crew document as requiring only one pilot and that has a maximum speed (Vne) of 250 KIAS or greater or a stall speed (Vso) of 80 KIAS or greater." The pilot did not hold an instrument rating, and his license bore the restriction, "Valid Daylight Only," which applied in both Canada and the US.

Based on TC and FAA information, regarding the TC certificate restriction, the accident airplane was not considered "high-performance" and therefore did not apply, but the daylight restriction applied to the pilot whether he was flying in Canada or the US. Flight time records indicated that, as of February 9, 2018, the pilot had about 597 total hours of flight experience. His most recent TC Category 3 medical certificate was issued in February 2018.

The pilot's journey log was recovered in the wreckage. It had separated into a few major portions, and some pages were missing. The earliest entry was dated February 13, 1983, and the most recent was dated February 9, 2018. The first entry that cited the accident airplane was dated June 24, 2014. A review of the entries in the log indicated that the pilot had accumulated about 346 hours in the accident airplane. Due to the damage and missing pages, his total flight experience could not be determined from the recovered Journey log. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONGeneral

TC information indicated that the airplane was manufactured in 1976 and was equipped with a Lycoming IO-540 series engine. The most recent annual or 100-hour inspection was completed in September 2017. The maintenance records indicated that, at the time of that inspection, the airplane had a total time (TT) since new of 2,743.5 hours, the propeller had a TT of 32.2 hours, and the engine time since overhaul was 762.8 hours.

The pilot was in the process of selling the airplane and an undated advertisement stated that the airplane and propeller had TT values similar to the maintenance records, but that the engine time since overhaul was cited as 682 hours. The advertisement noted that the airplane was equipped with an autopilot and an engine monitor with recording capabilities.

Fuel Capacity and Performance Information

The airplane was equipped with a total of four fuel tanks. These were configured as two fuel tanks and one filler neck per wing. The total fuel capacity was 98 gallons, of which 94 gallons were usable.

Takeoff, climb, and cruise fuel consumption vary as a function of several parameters, including airplane weight, ambient conditions, and power settings. No details regarding the route, altitude, or speed of the flight between CTB and GJT could be obtained; however, Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) performance data indicated that the airplane would have consumed about 4 gallons during the takeoff and climb to altitude. POH cruise flight fuel burn rates ranged between 12 and 18 gallons per hour (gph), with true airspeed values in the 140 to 150 knot range. Based on these values, the approximate fuel required for a non-stop, direct trip from CTB to GJT would range between 55 and 72 gallons, with a trip duration of about 4 to 5 hours.

Fueling Information

According to FBO personnel at GJT, after the pilot landed at GJT, he requested a top-off of the fuel tanks, but he did not remain with the airplane for the refueling. The airplane was serviced at GJT with 17.6 gallons of fuel that same day. Queries to several airports between CTB and GJT did not reveal any evidence of any interim stops or fuel purchases, but those queries were not all-inclusive. Pilot and passenger family members were asked to review credit card statements for fuel purchases, but none were located. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONPilot Briefing Information

According to Leidos Flight Service, the pilot did not contact either Leidos or DUATS on the accident day. According to a representative of ForeFlight, a pilot information and flight planning software company, no weather briefings were requested for the airplane using ForeFlight Mobile before the accident flight, or for any flights immediately preceding the accident flight. It also "appeared" that the accident pilot did not sign in to and use his device on ForeFlight Mobile to view any weather imagery before the accident flight. As of the date of the accident, the ForeFlight system did not have the ability to record whether the pilot viewed any "live" weather overlays, such as radar or satellite imagery, over the map view before the flight. The ForeFlight system also did not have the ability record whether the pilot viewed any individual ...