N639NA

Substantial
None

AGUSTAWESTLAND PHILADELPHIA AW139S/N: 41326

Accident Details

Date
Thursday, April 7, 2016
NTSB Number
CEN16LA401
Location
Galliano, LA
Event ID
20180509X55948
Coordinates
29.438055, -90.262496
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
None
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
9
Total Aboard
9

Probable Cause and Findings

The fatigue failure of a tail rotor blade erosion shield extension, which resulted in in-flight damage to a main rotor blade.

Aircraft Information

Registration
Make
AGUSTAWESTLAND PHILADELPHIA
Serial Number
41326
Engine Type
Turbo-shaft
Year Built
2013
Model / ICAO
AW139A139
Aircraft Type
Rotorcraft
No. of Engines
2
Seats
17
FAA Model
AW139

Registered Owner (Current)

Name
CHEVRON USA INC
Address
96 RUNWAY RD
City
PICAYUNE
State / Zip Code
MS 39466-8172
Country
United States

Analysis

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On April 7, 2016, at an unknown time, an AgustaWestland AW139 helicopter, N639NA, sustained damage to a main rotor blade during a flight over the Gulf of Mexico. The pilot, co-pilot, and 7 passengers were not injured, and the helicopter sustained substantial damage. The helicopter was registered to and operated by Chevron USA Inc., under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as business flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight and a company visual flight rules (VFR) flight plan had been filed. The flight originated at 0600 from South Lafourche Leonard Miller Jr. Airport, (GOA), Galliano, Louisiana, with an en route stop at an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico and terminated at GOA about 1135.

On May 9, 2018, the Chevron aviation department reported the accident to the NTSB and stated that during the flight the crew felt a slight vibration of the tail rotor. After landing at GAO during a post flight inspection, one of the tail rotor blade (TRB) erosion shield extensions (figure 1) commonly known as a lightning strip (LS) was missing and only its side tabs remained attached to the blade. Additionally, a main rotor blade (MRB) tip was damaged.

Figure 1 – TRB erosion shield extension diagram with notations (Courtesy of Leonardo)

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

The separated LS was identified as part number (p/n) 3G6410L00152 that was manufactured in electroplated nickel.

Chevron reported that as a normal maintenance practice, an LS would be installed as a brand new part or as an "on-condition" item that had been installed at the discretion of the company maintenance personnel after the component was inspected and determined to be in airworthy condition.

Chevron reported that the associated tail rotor blade (TRB) was received new from Leonardo on May 22, 2015, without an LS installed. An LS was subsequently installed by Chevron with no serial number tracking requirement.

On January 30, 2016, the white TRB was removed and replaced due to wear on the main erosion shield from contact with the LS. The same LS was reinstalled on the replacement white TRB.

From February 26, 2016, to April 6, 2016 the helicopter accumulated 129.1 flight hours with the new TRB installed. During that time, 34 daily serviceability checklist inspections were completed and no discrepancies applicable to the LS on the white TRB (or any other TRB) were noted.

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

A Chevron post flight inspection of the helicopter revealed that the LS on the white TRB was fractured and most of the component was missing. Only the side tabs, where the tail rotor damper bracket bushings pass through, remained attached (figure 2).

Figure 2 – Damaged Tail Rotor Erosion Shield Extension (Courtesy of Chevron)

The inspection also found damage to one of the main rotor blades; the blue MRB tip sustained damage mostly on the under side of the blade (figure 3). No additional damage was observed on the remainder of the helicopter.

Figure 3 – Damaged Main Rotor Blade (Courtesy of Chevron)

TESTS AND RESEARCH

Failure Analysis

Leonardo, the current AW139 helicopter manufacturer, performed a failure analysis on the remaining portion of the LS, using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), which revealed the presence of microcavity spots or porosity on the surface of the fractured section. Leonardo concluded that the microcavities were a direct result of the electroplating manufacturing process. In figure 4, the area circled in yellow is the microcavity, the red dashes indicate the crack initiation, and the blue arrows indicate the direction of the fatigue crack propagation.

Figure 4 – SEM image of the fatigue propagation from a micro-cavity, yellow circle (Courtesy of Leonardo)

Figure 5 shows a wide view of the fracture surface with the crack origination circled in red.

Figure 5 – SEM image, wide view of fracture surface (Courtesy of Leonardo)Static Testing

Finite element modeling (FEM) of an exemplar LS was completed to determine the expected inflight stress values, to include the influence of the centrifugal force and the bending moment due to the deformation of the TRB under beam bending loads. The simulation showed that the maximum stress values in the crack initiation area were considerably lower than the fatigue limit specified for the electroplated nickel material. Of note, the FEM model considered the geometric and fitting stress concentrations without the presence of a material flaw (such as a microcavity). Although the microcavity observed on the accident LS could not be replicated by the FEM model, Leonardo concluded that the presence of a microcavity could adversely influence the in-flight stresses and reduce the overall strength of the LS.

Flight Testing

A flight test was performed to evaluate the load conditions of the LS during flight. Strain measurement instrumentation was installed on a Leonardo helicopter to monitor and record the load conditions. Test results did not reveal any particular load condition that could lead to similar LS failures experienced during the accident flight.

ADDITIONNAL INFORMATION

Related Events

Leonardo identified 6 additional events involving the same LS part number and the three scenarios are listed below. Of note, all three scenarios resulted in an uneventful landing.

• LS crack identified during scheduled inspections (3 events)

• LS fractured and separated in flight (2 events)

• LS fractured and separated inflight, which resulted in damage to MRB tip (2 events, including the accident flight)

Corrective Actions

In response to the reports of similar LS failures, Leonardo changed the specification from electroplated nickel to a higher strength steel. As of July 31, 2017, for all newly built helicopters, the TRB installation drawing was updated to prescribe the installation of a steel LS, p/n 3G6410A03053, (figure 6). Additionally, Leonardo will issue an optional service bulletin to provide the steel LS upon customer request.

Figure 6 – Diagram of the updated steel LS (left) and electroplated nickel LS (right)

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# CEN16LA401