N4166C

Substantial
None

CESSNA R182S/N: R18200334

Accident Details

Date
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
NTSB Number
WPR23LA162
Location
Grand Canyon, AZ
Event ID
20230425107119
Coordinates
35.951752, -112.148200
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
None
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
2
Total Aboard
2

Probable Cause and Findings

The airplane’s loss of engine power for undetermined reasons and the pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack and subsequent failure to maintain adequate airspeed, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall.

Aircraft Information

Registration
Make
CESSNA
Serial Number
R18200334
Engine Type
Reciprocating
Year Built
1978
Model / ICAO
R182C82R
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Single Engine
No. of Engines
1
Seats
4
FAA Model
R182

Registered Owner (Current)

Name
BAS PART SALES LLC
Address
575 ED BEEGLES LN
City
GREELEY
State / Zip Code
CO 80631
Country
United States

Analysis

On April 19, 2023, about 1400 mountain standard time, a Cessna R182 airplane, N4166C, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Grand Canyon, Arizona. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal cross-country flight.

The pilot initially reported that during the flight the airplane’s fuel gauges were not reading correctly and that he decided he was going to land at Valle Airport (40G), Grand Canyon, Arizona, for fuel. During the final approach for runway 1 at 40G, he applied carburetor heat and the engine sputtered. The pilot aborted the landing and attempted to go around because of the wind. The airplane stalled and impacted the ground during the go-around.

In a follow-up interview, the pilot reported that the airplane was recently purchased and that he was flying the airplane to the St. Louis, Missouri, area. He said that there were no refueling services at his departure airport and that the left tank was about 3/4 full, and the right tank was 7/8 full before departing. He had planned to refuel at an unknown airport in western Kansas. About an hour into the flight, the pilot reported that the fuel was only being drawn from the left tank so he decided to conduct a precautionary landing to 40G. During the approach, the engine was “acting up” and he decided to add full power to perform a go-around. The engine produced no power, and shortly after the airplane “stalled out” at an unknown altitude. Both wings and the empennage impacted the ground.

The airport manager who was onsite shortly after the accident reported that the right wing was on the ground and that both wing tanks were leaking fuel. The wing fuel tank caps were removed for a visual inspection, and the right tank was full to the brim and the left tank was at about a 1/2 tank. The fuel selector was found in the BOTH position.

The airplane had total time of 4,784.4 hours. A review of the airplane’s logbooks revealed that the last annual inspection was completed on August 1, 2022, about 16.6 hours before the accident. In June of 2003, the engine was removed for a sudden stoppage inspection. The engine was repaired and inspected and reinstalled in November of 2003. The engine had 419.3 hours of operation since being reinstalled.

A postaccident examination revealed no evidence of anomalies with the airplane’s fuel system. The wing fuel tanks were intact and the associated lines and screens were unobstructed. The fuel caps were removed, and the cap seals and cap vent valves were undamaged. The fuel tank vent lines were unobstructed when air pressure was added. The fuel selector valve was tested and was found to operate normally in all detent positions. A small amount of fuel was found in the fuel strainer and was uncontaminated. The fuel strainer bowl and screen were free of contaminants. The examination of the engine and its components revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The induction system had no signs of induction leaks or obstructions. The exhaust flame cones were found to be intact and there were no signs of obstructions in the exhaust system. The carburetor was removed from the engine and sent to the manufacturer for a fuel flow evaluation and examination. The carburetor’s fuel flow performance was within acceptable limits at various power settings.

The airplane was operating in conditions not conducive to carburetor icing at any power.

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# WPR23LA162