N6192J

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn October 17, 2023, about 1219 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-28-140 airplane, N6192J, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near H. A. Clark Memorial Field Airport (CMR), Williams, Arizona. The two flight instructor-certificated pilots and the passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

According to information recovered from the pilots’ personal electronic devices (PEDs), the accident occurred on the third day of a multi-leg trip in the accident airplane. The pilots obtained the accident airplane on October 15, 2023, at Brown Field Municipal Airport (SDM), San Diego, California, and booked an airplane parking space for that evening through October 18, 2023, at North Las Vegas Airport (VGT), Las Vegas, Nevada. The pilots flew the airplane from SDM to VGT that evening.

On October 16, 2023, the pilots flew the airplane from about 1000 to 2000 with stops at St. George Regional Airport (SGU), St George, Utah; Hurricane Municipal Airport (1L8), Hurricane, Utah; Marble Canyon Airport (L41), Marble Canyon, Arizona; and Page Municipal Airport (PGA), Page, Arizona; with subsequent touch-and-go landings performed at Panguitch Municipal Airport (U55), Panguitch, Utah; and Bryce Canyon Airport (BCE), Bryce Canyon, Utah.

The right-seat pilot’s PED contained flight planning information that included these flight legs (as entered into a flight planning application) and showed a planned return to VGT that same day. The left-seat pilot’s two PEDs contained several videos from these flight legs, including two videos that captured audio of the airplane’s stall warning horn activating during the left-seat pilot’s climb after takeoff from L41 and BCE, and one video that captured the left-seat pilot’s climb after takeoff from U55, during which he stated that the airplane “had little hard time climbing” due to the local high altitude. (See the “Flight Recorders” section below for more information.) The right-seat pilot’s PED contained a message exchange with the passenger on October 16, 2023, discussing a plan for the passenger to take flights with the pilots the next day.

On October 17, 2023, the passenger joined the two pilots at VGT. A fuel receipt showed that 22.4 gallons of fuel were added to the airplane before the airplane departed on the first flight leg (the flight leg before the accident flight) about 0930. Videos recovered from the left-seat pilot’s PEDs showed the airplane in flight in the vicinity of Grand Canyon National Park Airport (GCN), Grand Canyon, Arizona, about 1038, then on approach into CMR about 1143. The airplane landed at CMR about 1150, and the pilots added about 20 gallons of fuel to the airplane.

The accident occurred about 30 minutes later, shortly after takeoff from runway 18 at CMR. The pilots’ PEDs contained no photos or videos of the accident flight.

A witness who lived near the airport reported observing the airplane flying at a low altitude over the trees with its wings wobbling. He stated that he had seen enough airplanes coming in and out of the airport to notice that the wobbling wings did not appear normal. He observed the airplane climb to a maximum altitude of about 100 to 200 ft agl before it began a left turn toward the airport road. He stated that he was “100% certain” that the airplane’s engine shut off before the airplane fell straight toward the ground. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONAccording to the Cherokee PA-28-140 Aircraft Flight Manual’s Climb Performance Chart, for a full-power takeoff (with the mixture leaned per Lycoming instructions) performed at an airplane gross weight of 2,150 lbs with a 0° flap setting at 89 mph calibrated airspeed, the climb performance in the calculated density altitude at CMR at the time of the accident would be about 200 ft per minute.

The airplane’s maximum takeoff gross weight was 2,150 lbs. Weight and balance calculations revealed that, at a standard fuel load of 36 gallons, the airplane’s gross weight would be about 2,150 lbs and the within center of gravity limits. At a full fuel load of 50 gallons, the airplane would be over its maximum gross weight limit. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONBased on the reported weather conditions at the time of the accident, the calculated density altitude was about 8,922 ft. In addition, the reported wind was about 280° at 6 knots with gusts to 12 knots. The winds would make for a moderate crosswind from the west and a slight tailwind of about 1 to 2 knots for takeoff from runway 18. AIRPORT INFORMATIONAccording to the Cherokee PA-28-140 Aircraft Flight Manual’s Climb Performance Chart, for a full-power takeoff (with the mixture leaned per Lycoming instructions) performed at an airplane gross weight of 2,150 lbs with a 0° flap setting at 89 mph calibrated airspeed, the climb performance in the calculated density altitude at CMR at the time of the accident would be about 200 ft per minute.

The airplane’s maximum takeoff gross weight was 2,150 lbs. Weight and balance calculations revealed that, at a standard fuel load of 36 gallons, the airplane’s gross weight would be about 2,150 lbs and the within center of gravity limits. At a full fuel load of 50 gallons, the airplane would be over its maximum gross weight limit. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe airplane came to rest inverted about 1/2 mile south of the runway 36 threshold on a heading of about 129°. The terrain was located about 6,670 ft in elevation and was flat and rocky with sage brush vegetation. A ground disturbance was observed at the initial impact point that was about 6 inches wide and 1 ft long with the debris field scattered along a bearing of about 171°. Fragments of red lens, consistent with the left wing position light, were located in the disturbance; additional ground disturbances and propeller strikes onto the ground were observed extending from the initial impact point to the airplane wreckage.

All major components of the airplane were contained within the main wreckage site. The flap handle, flap torque tube, and right flap were found in the retracted position. The propeller remained attached to the crankshaft propeller flange. The propeller flange sustained damage and deformation. One propeller blade was bent forward about mid-span, and the other blade was slightly twisted. Some chordwise marks were observed on both blades. The spinner was attached and was crushed.

Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of preimpact failure or malfunction that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONThe FAA Safety Team produced a safety enhancement topic on Mountain Flying Tips. The publication included, in part, the following information:

o A normally aspirated engine will lose 3% of its power per thousand ft of density altitude increase.

o The wings have less dense air with which to create lift. Since a propeller is an airfoil, it, too, will be less efficient.

o The aircraft gross weight and its effect on performance should be carefully considered. A minimum of 60 horsepower per occupant should be considered a minimum.

o To help regain some of the loss takeoff and landing performance at high density altitudes, you should reduce the weight at which you fly the airplane to no more than 90% of maximum gross weight.

The FAA Safety Team produced a safety enhancement topic on Mountain Flying. The briefing included in part:

Failure to take density altitude into consideration has led many pilots into situations their aircraft couldn’t handle. It is imperative that you understand how your aircraft performance is affected by density altitude. Even in the early evening, density altitude can be quite high and can present problems if you are not properly trained and prepared.

(Note: The following discussion was about the airport and had no direct association with the accident). The Director of Aviation Safety at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Arizona, mentioned that CMR was on their dual-only airport lists and that they were working a study of the airfield and drafting performance data and density altitude operations samples for CMR. He stated that, during the summer, they often cannot get a Cessna 172 out of CMR with more than a 50 to 100 ft clearance above terrain on upwind. He further commented that there is a small margin for error to safely land off-airport there. FLIGHT RECORDERSThe airplane was not equipped or required to be equipped with any onboard flight recorder. As stated in “History of Flight,” videos recovered from the left-seat pilot’s two PEDs provided information about some of the flight legs conducted the day before the accident, including the following:

o During the approach to SGU, the two pilots discussed where to touch down when landing behind a heavier aircraft, with one pilot correcting the other’s mistaken statement that they should land before the touchdown point of the heavier aircraft.

o During the landing roll at SGU, the left-seat pilot nearly lost control of the airplane during a high-speed exit from the runway, then the two pilots discussed how to navigate around a closed taxiway.

o While at 1L8, the right-seat pilot corrected the left-seat pilot regarding the airplane’s final approach and takeoff rotation airspeeds and corrected the left-seat pilot’s mistaken statement that he would use Vy (best rate of climb airspeed) to clear some powerlines, reminding him to use Vx (best angle of climb airspeed) instead.

o During approaches to L41 and U55, the right-seat pilot questioned the left-seat pilot about his execution of tight, nonstandard traffic patterns. The left-seat pilot landed the airplane at least halfway down the runway at L41, and overshot the centerline at U55, correcting back sharply at low altitude to perform a touch-and-go landing.

o During departure from L41, the left-seat pilot used two notches of flaps to perfor...