N9238

Substantial
Minor

ENSTROM F-28A S/N: 229

Accident Details

Date
Saturday, October 15, 1994
NTSB Number
NYC95LA012
Location
SHELBURNE, VT
Event ID
20001206X02512
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
Minor
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
2
Uninjured
0
Total Aboard
2

Probable Cause and Findings

The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions which resulted in a loss of tail rotor effectiveness.

Aircraft Information

Registration
Make
ENSTROM
Serial Number
229
Engine Type
Reciprocating
Year Built
1974
Model / ICAO
F-28A EN28
Aircraft Type
Rotorcraft
No. of Engines
1
Seats
3
FAA Model
F-28A

Registered Owner (Current)

Name
CRONITE GLOBAL CORP
Address
120 EAST HALSEY RD
City
PARSIPPANY
State / Zip Code
NJ 07054
Country
United States

Analysis

On October 15, 1994, at 1630 eastern daylight time, N9238, an Enstrom F-28A helicopter, a personal flight, collided with trees during a landing attempt at a private residence in Shelburne, Vermont. The private pilot, and passenger received minor injuries. The helicopter was substantially damaged. The flight originated at Pittstown, New Jersey with a refueling stop at Sarasota, New York. The flight was operated under 14 CFR Part 91.

The pilot and passenger were on a trip to visit friends, whose property was to be the landing site. The site had been marked with a white sheet.

According to the pilot, they had difficulty locating the marked spot as they approached the area. The pilot made several passes by the estimated location before he spotted the sheet. "We saw the sheet in the field establishing the landing location, and I turned to the right (southwest) planning to set up for an approach in a northerly direction which would have been into the wind.

"My altitude was about 550 feet MSL (150-200 AGL). As I completed the turn, the tail of the helicopter started coming around to the left, at first slowly, but with increasing speed until the ship was spinning in an uncontrollable fashion. Anti- torque pedals were totally ineffective and I couldn't tell if cyclic controls were of any use as the ship was spinning at about one turn per second."

According to an eyewitness, "Just as they passed overhead they turned clockwise, I assume to in order to make a second pass to land. As they completed the turn it became evident the something had gone wrong, since the aircraft did not straighten out but continued to turn. Gradually losing altitude the helicopter continued to spin in a clockwise direction, clearly out of control. They spun 5-7 complete circles before coming down in the small trees at the edge of our property."

The 1550 hour surface weather observation for Burlington, Vermont reported winds as 310 degrees at 10 knots.

The helicopter was examined by the FAA and Enstrom Helicopter on October 19, 1995. The examination did not disclose evidence of mechanical malfunction.

FAA circulated information (see attachment for detailed information) based on a reprint from Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. company newletter, Rotorbreeze, discusses the identification of the loss of tail rotor effective (unanticipated right yaw). According to the reprint, unanticipated right yaw is identified with the following four charactristics during low speed flight:

1. Weather cock stability (120 to 240 degrees) 2. Tail rotor vortex ring state (210 to 330 degrees) 3. Main rotor disc vortex interference (285 to 315 degrees) 4. Loss of translational lift (all azimuths)

According to the reprint, "The aircraft can be operated safely in the above relatively wind regions if proper attention is given to controlling the aircraft. However, if the pilot is inattentive for some reason and a right yaw rate is initiated in one of the above relative wind regions, the yaw rate may increase unless suitable correction action is taken."

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# NYC95LA012