Summary
On February 11, 2006, a Cessna 180J (N180HJS) was involved in an incident near Essex, NY. All 2 people aboard were uninjured. The aircraft sustained substantial damage.
The National Transportation Safety Board determined the probable cause of this incident to be: The pilot's failure to abort the takeoff in a timely manner. Factors included a partial loss of engine power for undetermined reasons and an undefined go, no-go point.
The pilot performed a pre-flight inspection of the airplane in her hangar. The temperature was below freezing and the hangar was unheated; however, the engine had been warmed with a pre-heater and an engine blanket. During the preflight inspection, the pilot did not see any ice crystals in the fuel sample. After startup, the airplane remained on the ground for "some time." The pilot leaned the mixture and applied carburetor heat "for at least 10 minutes" until just before takeoff, at which time, she noted the carburetor temperature to be 20 degrees C. She then secured the carburetor heat. During the takeoff roll, the engine would not attain full power; however it continued to operate smoothly. The pilot noted a less-than-normal manifold pressure, but wasn't sure of how much less.
This incident is documented in NTSB report NYC06CA068. AviatorDB cross-references NTSB investigation data with FAA registry records to provide comprehensive safety information for aircraft N180HJS.
Accident Details
Probable Cause and Findings
The pilot's failure to abort the takeoff in a timely manner. Factors included a partial loss of engine power for undetermined reasons and an undefined go, no-go point.
Aircraft Information
Analysis
The pilot performed a pre-flight inspection of the airplane in her hangar. The temperature was below freezing and the hangar was unheated; however, the engine had been warmed with a pre-heater and an engine blanket. During the preflight inspection, the pilot did not see any ice crystals in the fuel sample. After startup, the airplane remained on the ground for "some time." The pilot leaned the mixture and applied carburetor heat "for at least 10 minutes" until just before takeoff, at which time, she noted the carburetor temperature to be 20 degrees C. She then secured the carburetor heat. During the takeoff roll, the engine would not attain full power; however it continued to operate smoothly. The pilot noted a less-than-normal manifold pressure, but wasn't sure of how much less. She also noted that the normal right rudder inputs were not required to keep the airplane going straight. About 2/3 down the 1,800-foot turf runway, the pilot became concerned about the engine power. She felt that "stopping was unrealistic" and that the airplane could take off and clear a hedgerow at the end of the runway. However, after takeoff, the airplane did not clear the hedgerow. The runway was frozen, with rutting, but there was no snow cover. The runway was owned by the pilot, and she had not previously established a go, no-go point. The airplane normally became airborne in 500-600 feet. Post-accident examination of the airplane by Federal Aviation Administration inspectors revealed no mechanical anomalies. In addition, the carburetor was removed, and examined at an engine overhaul facility where the mechanic "noted no conditions that would have prevented the carburetor from functioning." Utilizing ambient temperature and dew point readings at three surrounding airports, carburetor icing charts revealed no probability of icing due to low temperatures. The interpolated temperature and dew point at the nearest airport, about the time of the accident, was 6 degrees Fahrenheit and 0 degrees Fahrenheit respectively.
Data Source
Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# NYC06CA068