N5307A

Substantial
Serious

CESSNA 210NS/N: 21063360

Accident Details

Date
Friday, December 20, 2013
NTSB Number
ERA14LA076
Location
Tampa, FL
Event ID
20131220X80310
Coordinates
27.994722, -82.542221
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
Serious
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
1
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
0
Total Aboard
1

Probable Cause and Findings

A total loss of engine power due to the fatigue failure of the No. 4 connecting rod. Contributing to the accident was a likely loss of lubrication for reasons that could not be determined during a postaccident engine examination.

Aircraft Information

Registration
N5307A
Make
CESSNA
Serial Number
21063360
Engine Type
Reciprocating
Year Built
1979
Model / ICAO
210NC210
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Single Engine
No. of Engines
1

Registered Owner (Historical)

Name
FLIGHT EXPRESS INC
Address
7250 STAR CHECK DR
Status
Deregistered
City
COLUMBUS
State / Zip Code
OH 43217-1025
Country
United States

Analysis

On December 19, 2013, at 2351 eastern standard time, a Cessna 210N, N5307A, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a total loss of engine power while on approach to Tampa International Airport (TPA), Tampa, Florida. The commercial pilot was seriously injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and the airplane was operating on an instrument flight rules flight plan. The flight had originated from Valdosta Regional Airport (VLD), about 2307, and was destined for TPA. The on-demand air cargo flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135.According to air traffic control (ATC) radar and voice communication information provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the pilot was cleared to land on runway 1R at 2345 while approaching TPA. At 2346, the pilot advised ATC that he needed to land on runway 10, and that the airplane's engine had "lost oil pressure." ATC then advised the pilot that runway 10 was closed for construction and that he could immediately turn left for a landing on runway 19R. At 2347, ATC asked the pilot if he required any emergency equipment, to which the pilot replied in the negative and stated that the engine was "running a little rough here, I should be able to make it though." About 30 seconds later the pilot revised his request and asked ATC to provide emergency response equipment for his landing. No further transmissions were received from the pilot.

A helicopter operated by the Tampa Police Department observed the airplane as it approached and impacted a berm short of runway 19R, on the airport property. The helicopter then landed adjacent to the accident site, and one of the crewmembers successfully extracted the pilot from the wreckage.

The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single and multi-engine land, as well as instrument airplane. The operator reported that he had accumulated 6,912 total hours of flight experience, 412 hours of which were in the accident airplane make and model. The pilot's most recent CFR 135 proficiency check was completed on a flight immediately preceding the accident flight.

According to FAA airworthiness records, the airplane was manufactured in 1979. It was equipped with a Continental Motors IO-520-L reciprocating engine rated at 285 hp. The engine was installed onto the airframe following a rebuild by Continental Motors on December 18, 2009. The airplane's most recent 100-hour inspection was completed on November 26, 2013. At that time, the number 1 cylinder was removed to replace a broken exhaust valve, and the exhaust valve seats of cylinders number 1, 2, and 3 were lapped. Additionally, the engine oil filter was changed and the element of the old filter was examined, the oil was drained, and the engine was subsequently serviced with 11 quarts of oil. At the time of the 100-hour inspection, the engine had accumulated 1,579 total hours of operation since it had been installed in 2009. The maintenance logs did not detail any further maintenance of the engine, and at the time of the accident, the airplane had accumulated 41 additional flight hours since the 100-hour inspection. Review of the operator's operations specifications showed that the engine model's overhaul time-in-service interval was 1,700 hours.

The airframe was examined at the accident site under the supervision of an FAA inspector. Examination of the airframe revealed that the left wing tip was damaged, along with the engine and lower portion of the forward fuselage, which displayed considerable compression-type damage. Engine oil residue was observed on the fractured windscreen and the vertical stabilizer. Flight control continuity was established from the cockpit to all flight control surfaces. The extension of the elevator trim actuator was measured and correlated to a 10-degree tab trailing edge down position. The flaps were found in a position between 0 and 10 degrees of extension, and the flap switch handle was found in the 20-degree position.

An unquantified volume of fuel was found in both fuel tanks, and the cockpit fuel selector valve was positioned to the left fuel tank. The fuel boost pump switch was found selected to the "ON" position. The landing gear position selector handle was found set to the "DOWN" position, and the main landing gear was down and locked. The nose landing gear had separated from the fuselage during the impact sequence.

The engine remained attached to the fuselage, and the top of the engine crankcase was breached in the vicinity of the number 2 and 4 cylinders. The piston pin and connecting rod of the number 4 cylinder was recovered from inside the engine cowling. The engine was subsequently separated from the airframe and forwarded to its manufacturer for detailed examination.

The throttle and fuel metering assembly displayed impact damage signatures to the throttle body. All of the control arms were secured and were capable of movement by hand. The finger screen was absent of contamination. The fuel pump was free to rotate and the fuel pump drive was intact and undamaged. Flow testing of the fuel pump showed that it functioned properly through its full range of operation. The manifold valve plunger assembly was intact, secure and undamaged, and there were no signatures of fuel stains or leakage in the vent chamber side of the diaphragm. The number 2 fuel injector displayed impact damage signatures and a portion of the injector remained in the cylinder, while the number 6 fuel injector was clogged with debris. The numbers 1, 3, 5, and 4 fuel injectors were absent of debris and displayed normal operating signatures.

The number 4 spark plugs were oil-soaked and displayed normal wear signatures, while the remaining top and bottom sparkplugs exhibited normal wear signatures. The left and right magnetos turned freely with impulse coupling engagement, and when tested on a test bench with replacement ignition harnesses, produced a blue spark from each lead across a 7 mm gap through the full range of test bench RPM.

The oil pump drive was intact. The oil pump cavity contained scoring and scratches consistent with hard particle passage, and small metallic particulates were observed within the oil pump cavity. The oil pump gear teeth were intact and undamaged. The oil pressure relief valve and seat contained small metallic particles, and the seat displayed normal seating signatures. The oil filter element was examined and contained an abundance of flakes and slivers from the damaged internal engine components. The oil sump displayed impact damage signatures, was breached, and only a small amount of residual oil remained within the sump. A significant quantity of metallic debris, consistent with connecting rod, connecting rod bearing, piston, and piston ring material, was observed within the oil sump. Metallic material was observed on the oil suction screen, though the screen was not obstructed.

Each of the cylinder combustion chambers had a normal amount of combustion deposits and their bores were free of scoring and undamaged. Each of the intake and exhaust valve heads exhibited normal deposits and operating signatures, and the rocker box area had an oil residue consistent with lubrication to the respective overheads. With the exception of the number 3 cylinder, the remaining overhead components (valves, rocker arms, guides, springs, retainers and shafts) were lubricated and undamaged. The number 3 cylinder intake push rod tube was pushed up into the cylinder overhead, and the push tube washers were deformed. The number 3 intake and exhaust rocker arms were removed and visually inspected; both rocker arms, as well as the remaining intake and exhaust rocker arm shafts, displayed normal operating signatures.

Each of the piston heads exhibited normal amounts of combustion deposits and all of their piston skirts displayed some degree of mechanical damage, with the exception of the number 5 and 6 pistons, which were free of damage. A crescent-shaped impression was noted on the number 3 piston face, which was consistent in shape with the outside diameter of the exhaust valve. All of the piston rings were intact, free in their grooves, and exhibited normal wear and operating signatures with the following exceptions: the number 1 bottom piston ring displayed mechanical damage and a portion of the ring was missing; a portion of the number 2 bottom piston ring groove was missing, but the piston ring remained in its normal installation location; the number 3 bottom piston ring displayed mechanical damage and a portion of the ring was missing; portions of the number 4 oil scraper ring were found in the oil sump. Each of the piston pin and plug assemblies were intact and undamaged.

The crankshaft and counterweight assembly exhibited lubrication distress, thermal damage, and mechanical damage concentrated at the number 1, 2, 4, and 5 connecting rod journals. The crankshaft main bearing journals were intact, undamaged and exhibited incipient oil starvation signatures. The number 1 connecting rod journal exhibited thermal distress and scoring consistent with deficient lubrication. The number 2 connecting rod journal exhibited signs of lubrication distress, thermal discoloration, mechanical damage and displacement of the journal material. Portions of the number 2 connecting rod bearing were smeared into the journal. The number 3 connecting rod journal was relatively undamaged and showed signs of lubrication. The number 4 connecting rod sustained thermal discoloration, mechanical damage and displacement of the journal material; all consistent with lubrication distress. The number 5 connecting rod journal exhibited thermal distress and scoring from lack of sufficient lubrication. The number 6 connecting rod journal sustained thermal discoloration. Excluding the displacement of journal material on number 2 and 4, the oil transfer passages were open and u...

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# ERA14LA076