N48410

Substantial
None

Cessna 152S/N: 15280907

Accident Details

Date
Sunday, July 21, 2019
NTSB Number
CEN19LA232
Location
Fredericksburg, TX
Event ID
20190722X83356
Coordinates
30.335832, -98.839447
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
Highest Injury
None
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
0
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
2
Total Aboard
2

Probable Cause and Findings

A total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.

Aircraft Information

Registration
Make
CESSNA
Serial Number
15280907
Engine Type
4-cycle
Model / ICAO
152C152
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Single Engine
No. of Engines
1
Seats
2
FAA Model
152

Registered Owner (Current)

Name
AZAR SUZANNE S
Address
2424 ALTURA AVE
City
EL PASO
State / Zip Code
TX 79930-1707
Country
United States

Analysis

On July 21, 2019, about 1241 central daylight time, a Cessna 152 airplane, N48410, impacted terrain and fencing during a forced landing following an inflight loss of engine power near Fredericksburg, Texas. The private pilot and the pilot rated passenger were uninjured. The airplane sustained substantial damage to its empennage and fuselage. The airplane was registered to Aeronautical LLC and operated by the pilot as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed in the area about the time of the accident, and the flight was not operated on a flight plan. The flight originated about 1220 from the Gillespie County Airport (T82), near Fredericksburg, Texas, and was destined for the Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU), near Georgetown, Texas.

According to the pilot, the purpose of the flight was to fly from GTU to T82 and return to GTU in the same day. The pilot was flying with a family member who was a flight instructor. They fueled at GTU just before the flight and flew to T82 without incident. The airplane was performing "well" during the flight. They had lunch at the diner on the field at T82.

Following lunch, they conducted a preflight inspection of the airplane, performed an engine run-up, and took off as "usual." Everything sounded "normal." The airplane was level at 3,500 ft where the pilot asked the pilot rated passenger to takeover the airplane controls so the pilot could conduct activities not associated with flying the airplane. Both pilots then heard the engine starting to run rough. They both concurred that the engine sounded rough, and it continued to sound rough; engine speed was also decreasing. They looked at the distance to GTU and considered the options in conducting the flight. The pilots "went" through the emergency checklist, evaluated the instruments, and decided to return to T82. The airplane subsequently lost additional engine power and altitude. They established the best glide airspeed for the airplane. They elected to land on a field that was bounded by a powerline. The terrain was soft. After touchdown, they applied full brakes. However, they were unable to stop the airplane before it impacted a barbed wire fence.

The airplane's emergency procedures, in part, stated:

ENGINE FAILURE DURING FLIGHT

1. Airspeed -- 60 KIAS [knots indicated airspeed].

2. Carburetor Heat -- ON.

3. Primer -- IN and LOCKED.

4. Fuel Shutoff Valve -- ON.

5. Mixture -- RICH.

6. Ignition Switch -- BOTH (or START if propeller is stopped).

A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the wreckage at the accident site and took pictures. He subsequently performed a test run of the engine at the site. The engine started and was operational "with no issues." The inspector also examined the carburetor's filter and it did not contain any debris. The inspector stated that the visible damage present to the tail section was substantial damage.

At 1255, the recorded weather at T82 was: Wing 190° at 9 kts gusting to 16 kts; visibility 10 statute miles; sky condition clear; temperature 32° C; dew point 17° C; altimeter 30.00 inches of mercury.

The recorded local temperature and dew point spread data near the time of the engine power loss was plotted on a carburetor icing chart. The charted data showed that the weather in the area was conducive to serious carburetor icing at descent power.

The pilot, in part, stated:

There were a few factors that helped this rough landing not

be worse. My copilot is an experienced pilot and CFII and

we had good communication and teamwork throughout

our flight. The airplane has new tires that helped on the

rough surface of the field. What surprised us was that the

engine lost power so quickly.

The Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, in part, states:

When conditions are conducive to carburetor icing

during flight, periodic checks should be made to detect

its presence. If detected, full carburetor heat should be

applied immediately, and it should be left in the ON

position until you are certain that all the ice has been

removed. If ice is present, applying partial heat or

leaving heat on for an insufficient time might aggravate

the situation. In extreme cases of carburetor icing, even

after the ice has been removed, full carburetor heat

should be used to prevent further ice formation. A

carburetor temperature gauge, if installed, is very

useful in determining when to use carburetor heat.

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# CEN19LA232