N9725Z

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn February 4, 2021, about 1051 Alaska standard time, a Cessna A185E, N9725Z, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident about 14 miles northeast of Chitina, Alaska. The commercial pilot and passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 scheduled passenger flight.

A Garmin 696 GPSMAP was recovered from the accident site. GPS data logs for the day of the accident revealed that, after reaching a GPS altitude of about 7,500 ft, the airplane continued on a southeasterly track for about 10 minutes with a groundspeed between 120 and 130 knots.

About 2 minutes before the accident, the airplane initiated a gradual right turn to the south and began a descent, which averaged about 734 ft per minute. The last fully recorded in-flight data point was at 1050:52, when the airplane was at a GPS altitude of 5,715 ft with a

groundspeed of 154 kts and on a track of 282° (see figure 1).

Figure 1. Flight track

AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe accident airplane was involved in a collision in May 2014 that damaged the right wing, vertical stabilizer, rudder, right horizontal stabilizer, and right elevator. The right wing was replaced with a wing from a Cessna 180H. The differences between the Cessna 180H wing and the Cessna A185E wing are not structurally significant. Some repairs were performed to the outboard upper skin and ribs of the replacement right wing. The vertical stabilizer, rudder, right horizontal stabilizer, and right elevator were repaired.

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONTwo pilots that responded to the accident site shortly after the accident reported no turbulence or significant winds aloft from the surface to 5,500 ft msl.

AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe accident airplane was involved in a collision in May 2014 that damaged the right wing, vertical stabilizer, rudder, right horizontal stabilizer, and right elevator. The right wing was replaced with a wing from a Cessna 180H. The differences between the Cessna 180H wing and the Cessna A185E wing are not structurally significant. Some repairs were performed to the outboard upper skin and ribs of the replacement right wing. The vertical stabilizer, rudder, right horizontal stabilizer, and right elevator were repaired.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe wreckage was scattered over mountainous, wooded terrain northeast of Chitina on the north side of the Chitina River Valley. The main wreckage included both landing gear with wheel penetration skis, engine, firewall, main fuselage, instrument panel, and left wing. The right wing, right aileron, right lift strut, and empennage were not found with the main wreckage. The part (top skin of right wing) located farthest from the main wreckage was about 710 ft from the main wreckage; the empennage was located about 446 ft from the main wreckage; and the inboard portion of the right wing was located about 407 ft from the main wreckage. The debris path and separated sections of the right wing and empennage were consistent with an in-flight breakup (see figure 2).

Figure 2. Debris field

Examination of the main wreckage revealed evidence consistent with the airplane impacting the ground in a high-speed, near-vertical descent. The lower end of the left-wing strut was separated from the fuselage. The left-wing strut bolt was intact in the fitting and the fuselage lugs were fractured through the hole. The left wing remained attached at the fuselage attach points and exhibited compressive buckling on the inboard portion of the wing consistent with impact damage and the left wing being fully attached and intact before ground impact.

The skis remained attached to their respective attach points and all ski arresting cables, bungees, and rigging were intact and attached at their respective attach points. No preimpact mechanical anomalies were noted with the skis or their rigging.

All airframe parts were located within the main wreckage and surrounding woods. Flight control continuity was confirmed to all flight control surfaces except where recovery and overload separations existed. Both right-wing attach points exhibited damage and deformation in an upward direction at the wing root, consistent with a positive overload separation of the right wing before ground impact. The right-wing strut separated from the lower strut fitting with the rivets showing shear overstress signatures consistent with positive overload. The left deformation of the vertical stabilizer and rudder and the fractured attach points were consistent with the right wing failing first. Cable tears in the left fuselage and right empennage were consistent with the tail departing to the left side. All of the fracture surfaces examined had a dull, grainy appearance consistent with overstress separation. There was no evidence of corrosion or fatigue noted on any of the areas examined.

The two-bladed, constant speed propeller remained attached to the crankshaft flange; however, the crankshaft was fractured behind the crankshaft flange near the front of the engine case. The fractured surface had an angular, dull, grainy appearance consistent with overstress separation. One of the propeller blades was slightly bent aft and rotated freely in the hub. The other propeller blade was bent aft about 180° with minor leading-edge chunking, chordwise scratching, and gouging on the cambered face.

Examination of the engine did not reveal evidence of any preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.