N507TJ

On April 26, 2022, at 1300 eastern daylight time, a Bell Helicopter Textron Canada, 429, N507TJ, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Elba, New York. The flight instructor and pilot receiving instruction were fatally injured. The helicopter was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight.

A representative of the operator stated that the instructional flight was recurrent training being conducted by the helicopter manufacturer’s flight instructor with multiple training flights planned throughout the day; the accident flight was the second flight of the day. The first pilot who received training from the flight instructor on the morning of the accident flight stated that during their flight they entered vortex ring state (VRS) with a very high descent rate, which was confirmed by the flight data recovered from the accident helicopter. While in VRS, the pilot stated that he didn’t know why they were going so deep into VRS and that the instructor was just sitting there, “hands on his lap.” So, the pilot, feeling uncomfortable at that point, had to exit this very high descent rate on his own rather than waiting for further guidance from the instructor pilot.

The helicopter was equipped with an Electronic Data Recorder (EDR) within its Display Unit (DU), also known as the Pilot Flight Display and Multi-Function Display, that recorded flight, navigation, engine, and usage parameters every half second. It was also equipped with a SKYTRAC transceiver that facilitated real-time fleet awareness, group communications, and systems performance trending and analysis. The accident flight was also recorded by automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B).

ADS-B data, combined with the DU and SKYTRAC data sources, revealed that the accident pilot and the flight instructor departed Genesee County Airport (GVQ) Batavia, New York at 1111, and performed multiple maneuvers in the immediate vicinity of the airport before departing to the east. About 20 minutes later, the helicopter returned to the airport and performed additional maneuvers in the airport traffic pattern for about 30 minutes before again departing the traffic pattern. From about 1223 to 12:55, the pilot and instructor practiced single-engine training and dual-engine failure training with autorotations. These training maneuvers were completed about 4 minutes and 30 seconds before the accident occurred.

About 12:56, the helicopter was flying over the airport and turned north. About 12:58, the helicopter was approximately 2 nm north-northeast of the airport and began a clockwise circular pattern. From 12:59:26 to 12:59:44 (18 seconds), the helicopter was operating in an envelope conducive to VRS. At 12:59:47 there were multiple abrupt control inputs; the cyclic was nearly full forward and to the left with right antitorque pedal input applied. The collective lever position was in the full down position; the airspeed was decreasing from 26 knots to 9 knots with the helicopter’s vertical descent rate increasing from -800 to -1,300 fpm.

Several eyewitnesses observed and heard the helicopter flying overhead before the accident and throughout the accident sequence. One stated that he observed the helicopter “almost stationary” after it flew over, and then as it started to fly away, he heard a loud “bang”, and the helicopter began to descend out of control. An additional witness stated that the helicopter was hovering before it “fell apart” with the fuselage falling separately, and another witness stated she did not see the helicopter but heard what sounded like an engine making a “whooshing” sound, and then “three loud and rapid cracks” in succession. She further stated that she heard the helicopter impact the ground and heard the rotor blades striking the ground rapidly.

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

The accident helicopter was maintained by the operator under the manufacturer’s recommended inspection program. The last entry in the helicopter’s airframe maintenance logbook was dated April 24, 2022, and reflected airframe and engine total times of 1,039.6 hours.

Each engine contained an electronic engine control (EEC) and a data collection unit (DCU). Attempts were made to recover stored data within these units, but no data could be recovered from the No. 1 engine EEC and DCU due to impact damage. However, data were recovered from the No. 2 engine EEC and DCU. The recovered data showed that there were no faults or exceedances recorded during the flight.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

The helicopter fuselage, containing the cockpit, engine, transmission, and rotor head assembly, struck electrical distribution wires as it impacted the terrain at an elevation of about 1,220 ft msl and was oriented on a heading of about 190°. The helicopter came to rest on its left side; the fuselage impacted the ground and crushed inwards and fractured into two large sections, leaving no occupiable space in the cockpit. A small post-impact fire developed in the engine compartment but was quickly extinguished by first responders. The wreckage path was about 2,500 ft-long and oriented in a direction of 250° magnetic from the first wreckage pieces towards the main fuselage resting place.

The tail boom had fractured and separated into two sections with angled fracture lines consistent with main rotor blade contact. The forward tail boom section remained attached to the upper section of the fuselage about 8 ft aft of the engine exhaust. The aft tail boom, containing the tail rotor, partial drive shaft, vertical fin, and horizontal stabilizer remained largely intact and was discovered about 390 ft on a heading of about 075° from the main wreckage.

A 16-inch section of the tail rotor drive shaft cover and a partial carbon fiber tail rotor shaft was discovered 1,620 ft and a 072° heading from the main wreckage; it exhibited an angled slice line consistent with main rotor blade contact.

The tail rotor remained installed on the tail rotor gearbox, which itself remained installed on the separated empennage. The four tail rotor blades did not exhibit significant damage. The tail rotor input control was manually actuated and a corresponding change of pitch for all four tail rotor blades was observed. The tail rotor pitch control tube had fractured forward of the tail rotor gearbox and exhibited multiple fractures through its normal routing through the tail boom. The tail rotor servo actuator and stability and control augmentation system (SCAS) actuator remained installed and connected to the tail rotor pitch control tube. The forward tail rotor drive shaft remained connected to the main gearbox but had fractured about midway to the fan blower shaft. The fan blower remained installed on the airframe. The forward segmented drive shaft remained attached to the fan blower shaft and was continuous through the forward snubber but had fractured near its connection to the aft segmented drive shaft and the hanger bearing; the hanger bearing was not present. The aft segmented drive shaft had fractured near its forward end and at the tail gearbox input flange. A portion of the aft snubber remained attached to its snubber mount. The tail rotor gearbox remained installed on the empennage. The tail rotor was manually rotated through several 360° rotation of the tail rotor gearbox input flange and resulted in a corresponding rotation of the tail rotor. The rotation was smooth and there were no abnormal sounds or evidence of binding or other restrictions.

Examination of the flight control system consisting of the cyclic and collective push-pull tubes were traced through cuts made to facilitate recovery and overload separation damage to each of their respective servo actuators, cockpit controls, and their respective hydraulic system. The collective push-pull tube was continuous through the forward bellcrank up to the collective servo actuator. Control continuity was established between the collective servo actuator and the collective lever. The lateral cyclic push-pull tube was continuous to the forward bellcrank, to which the forward [of the two] roll SCAS actuators was attached. All the damage had features that were consistent with overload due to impact and aerodynamic forces. There was no anomalous preimpact damage or irregularity to the flight control system. Control continuity was confirmed for both collective, cyclic, and tail rotor directional control.

Examination of the hydraulic system consisting of two separate and independent pressurized hydraulic systems were used to assist cyclic, collective, and antitorque flight controls. All damage was consistent with impact; there was no preimpact anomalous damage or other irregularity noted in the hydraulic modules, actuator pumps, or associated systems.

Examination of all four main rotor blades, identified as ‘orange’, ‘blue’, green’, and ‘red', revealed they were separated from the main rotor head and discovered within the debris field northeast of the main wreckage. The span of all four blades were recovered. The tip ends of all four blades exhibited impact marks. The ‘red’ main rotor blade afterbody was generally whole and its leading edge did not exhibit significant fractures. On the lower surface of the ‘blue’ main rotor blade, an impact gouge was present, its location (about 89 inches from the inboard blade bolt) and size was consistent with the antenna mounted immediately aft of the engine exhaust pipes.

The upper rod end of the ‘blue’, ‘orange’, ‘red’, and ‘green’ main rotor blade pitch change links (PCL) remained attached to its pitch horn but had fractured at their threaded connection to their respective PCL. The fracture on all four PCL upper rod end threads exhibited signatures consistent with overload and was deformed in the inboard direction. The lower rod ends of all four PCLs remained attached to the rotating swashplate but had fractured features consistent with overload. Three PCL b...