N557XJ

Unknown
Serious

BOMBARDIER INC BD-100-1A10S/N: 20047

Accident Details

Date
Wednesday, July 27, 2022
NTSB Number
WPR22LA284
Location
San Francisco, CA
Event ID
20220728105614
Coordinates
38.032205, -121.336120
Aircraft Damage
Unknown
Highest Injury
Serious
Fatalities
0
Serious Injuries
1
Minor Injuries
0
Uninjured
2
Total Aboard
3

Probable Cause and Findings

An inflight upset resulting in serious injury to the cabin attendant following an autopilot disconnect for reasons that could not be determined based on the available information.

Aircraft Information

Registration
Make
BOMBARDIER INC
Serial Number
20047
Engine Type
Turbo-fan
Year Built
2005
Model / ICAO
BD-100-1A10
Aircraft Type
Fixed Wing Multi Engine
No. of Engines
2
Seats
8
FAA Model
BD-100-1A10

Registered Owner (Current)

Name
BANK OF UTAH TRUSTEE
Address
50 SOUTH 200 EAST STE 110
City
SALT LAKE CITY
State / Zip Code
UT 84111
Country
United States

Analysis

On July 27, 2022, about 1236 Pacific daylight time, a Bombardier Inc BD-100-1A10 (marketed as a Challenger 300), N557XJ, was involved in an accident near San Francisco, California. The cabin attendant was seriously injured; the pilot and co-pilot were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 positioning flight.

The pilot-in-command (PIC) reported that the airplane arrived at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) San Francisco, California, about 1130 from Shively Field Airport, Saratoga, Wyoming. Five passengers deplaned and a new cabin attendant joined the current crew. After a briefing and compliance with the required checklists for the airplane, the flight crew departed to the east to Page, Arizona, with the second-in-command (SIC) as the pilot flying.

The PIC indicated that, as the airplane continued to climb through 20,000 ft msl, an amber CAS “AP STAB TRIM FAIL” message appeared. The PIC began to review a checklist to troubleshoot the amber message when a second amber CAS message, “AP HOLDING NOSE DOWN” appeared. The PIC assumed control of the airplane after a positive exchange of the flight controls. The PIC stated the autopilot then “disconnected on its own just as I was going to push the disconnect button.” The airplane immediately pitched up, and after “several hard oscillations,” according to the SIC, the PIC was able to recover the airplane into straight and level flight. During this time, the cabin attendant in the aft cabin crawled up to the cockpit and reported to the crew that she was seriously injured.

The PIC reported that he did not feel comfortable reengaging the autopilot and continued to manually fly the airplane. After being cleared to return to SFO, the crew landed the airplane without further incident and the cabin attendant received medical treatment. No damage was sustained to the airplane or engines.

The cabin attendant later reported that she received a preflight briefing indicating that she should be seated and belted until the airplane reached 10,000 ft msl. She stated that, about 15 minutes after takeoff, she unbelted and moved about the cabin to perform her duties; she was not seated or secured with a seatbelt at the time of the in-flight upset (company policy allowed cabin crew to maneuver around the cabin above 10,000 ft msl).

The audition of the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) revealed that the event was not captured due to being overwritten on the continuous recording loop of the CVR. Although the FDR “Master Caution” parameter recorded the posting of multiple caution messages around the time of the event, the FDR did not record which caution messages were posted. The FDR did not contain any telemetry about the “AP STAB TRIM FAIL” or “AP HOLDING NOSE DOWN” annunciations.

FDR Data

Figure 1. FDR data of flight track

· At 1230:51, the airplane departed runway 28R at SFO. As the airplane climbed, the magnetic heading changed from 282° to 54° (right turn).

· At 1232:19, the autopilot was engaged while the airplane was at 4,265 ft pressure altitude, 220 knots (kts) indicated airspeed (244 kts ground speed), and a magnetic heading of 54°; the left elevator was at 5° while the right elevator was at 7°.

· At 1232:24, the master caution activated for 5 seconds. The autopilot remained engaged, and the master caution was active again at 1232:38 (for 6 seconds).

· At 1236:39, both the Master Disconnect parameter and the Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) Abnormal Disconnect parameter changed from “Not Disconnected" to “Disconnected” (abnormal disconnect is any autopilot disconnect caused by any method other than the AP button on the flight guidance panel [FGP]). At this time, vertical acceleration increased from 0.985g to 2.221g in less than a second.

· At 1236:40, the autopilot state was changed from engaged to disengaged. Vertical acceleration (sampled 8 times per second) reached -0.426g during this second.

· At 1236:41, vertical acceleration was 2.096g and reduced within the second to 0.176g. The autopilot remained off for the remainder of the flight.

· At 1236:48, the pilot and copilot manual trim enabled was active seven times within the minute following the autopilot becoming disengaged. For each occurrence where the pilot manual trim enabled was active, a respective pitch trim command nose down flag was active. At each occurrence, the stabilizer trimmed nose down.

· At 1238:21, the right primary flight display (PFD) flag showed it failed for 3 seconds.

· At 1238:22, the master caution activated for 16 seconds.

· At 1239:08, the right multifunction display (MFD) flag showed it failed for 14 seconds.

· At 1242:50, the left MFD flag showed it had failed and remained in this state for the rest of the flight. At this time, the airplane began to return to SFO. The remainder of the flight was uneventful.

· At 1302:12, the weight on wheels on the left and right main landing gear registered a change from AIR to GND. The airplane landed on runway 28R without incident and taxied normally off the runway.

Quick Reference Handbook (QRH)

The airplane’s manufacturer’s QRH contained procedures for responding to the presented CAS messages. The QRH available and used by the flight crew was last revised on June 14, 2022:

AP STAB TRIM FAIL

“Condition: Autopilot pitch trim has failed.

Objective: Assume manual control.

WARNING: An abrupt change in control force, or an out of trim situation may be experienced when disconnecting the autopilot. SMKG /BELTS should be selected on.

CAUTION: Minimize changes to airspeed and configuration to minimize control forces and out of trim situation.

(1) Flight controls ........................................................................................... HOLD FIRMLY

(2) Autopilot ..............................................DISCONNECT using control wheel MSW switch

(3) Retrim airplane if necessary.

(4) Autopilot ...................................................................................................... DO NOT USE”

AP HOLDING NOSE DOWN

“Condition: Autopilot is holding control force in the direction indicated.

Objective: Correct mistrim condition.

WARNING: An abrupt change in control force, or an out of trim situation may be experienced when disconnecting the autopilot. SMKG / BELTS should be selected on.

CAUTION: Minimize changes to airspeed and configuration to minimize control forces and out of trim situation.

(1) Flight controls ........................................................................................ HOLD FIRMLY

(2) Autopilot ..................................................................DISCONNECT using control wheel MSW switch

(3) Retrim airplane if necessary.

(4) Autopilot .....................................................................................................AS DESIRED”

The flight attendant reported that the BELTS light was on during departure, but could not recall if the light extinguished at any point during the flight. In addition, the FDR data did not include any information about the BELTS light indication. According to the operator, company procedures allowed the cabin attendant to be moving about the cabin at the time of the accident.

Manufacturer Reference Information of AP STAB TRIM FAIL and Autopilot

According to the airplane manufacturer,

The purpose of the AP STAB TRIM FAIL Caution message is to advise flight crew[s] that the autopilot is no longer able to command horizontal stabilizer trim. In isolation, this has no effect on autopilot engagement, i.e. the message itself does not cause the autopilot to disengage. Inability to command horizontal trim or an out-of-trim condition will not result in autopilot disengagement; in such cases, the autopilot continues to control pitch using only the elevator.

The autopilot is designed to remain engaged for all but a few specific failure conditions; when the autopilot disengages due to one of these failure conditions, it is referred to as abnormal automatic disengagement. There are also a number of pilot actions which will cause the autopilot to disengage: use of the master disconnect switches on the control wheels, the AP or YD button on the Flight Guidance Panel (FGP), the AP/YD disconnect bar on the FGP, use of the Takeoff/Go-around (TOGA) switches, use of manual trim, or setting the pitch trim select switch to SEC or OFF. When the autopilot disengages due to one of these pilot actions, it is referred to as normal disengagement. When the autopilot is disengaged with the aircraft in an out-of-trim condition, the elevator is released and free to move until the flight crew take manual control via the control columns; this can result in pitch oscillations driven by the aerodynamic forces from the horizontal stabilizer and lack of counter-balancing aerodynamic forces from the now-released elevator moving back to a neutral position. The pitch oscillations are a natural result of an out-of-trim aircraft and an unrestrained elevator. Maintaining a solid grip on the control column so as to prevent the elevator from moving back to neutral when it is released by the autopilot, reduces or can even prevent pitch oscillations upon autopilot disengagement.

With the autopilot engaged and unable to command trim, and depending on changes to airspeed, altitude and aircraft configuration (flaps position, etc.) the aircraft can enter an out-of-trim condition. Regardless of how out-of-trim the aircraft becomes, the autopilot will remain engaged and continue to attempt to maintain desired pitch attitude with the elevator.

If the out-of-trim condition exceeds a pre-defined threshold, as determined via a voltage feedback loop between the elevator servo and autopilot, an AP HOLDING NOSE DOWN or AP HOLDING NOSE UP Caution message will post on the CAS. The purpose of these messages is to advise the flight crew that the autopilot is using significant elevator deflection to maintain d...

Data Source

Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# WPR22LA284