N202GM

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn June 08, 2023, about 1124 Pacific daylight time, an experimental, amateur-built Steen Skybolt, N202GM, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident in Rio Vista, California. The two pilots were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

On the morning of the accident, the front-seat pilot asked the aft-seat pilot to pick him up at Sacramento Mather Airport (MHR), Sacramento, California. The aft-seat pilot departed about 1000 from Concord, California, where the accident airplane was based. The front-seat pilot had dropped off another airplane earlier at MHR and needed to return to Concord.

Recorded radar data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) revealed a primary target that started near the airplane’s known departure point at 1059:09 and ended near the accident site at 1124:20. The flight track was consistent with the airplane flying in a southwesterly direction. At 1115:30, the data was consistent with the airplane making a 360° turn or maneuvering. At 1116:15, the flight track continued on a southerly heading along the Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel. The returns then became sparse and continued over the middle of Rio Vista Municipal Airport (O88). The track was consistent with the airplane entering the downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern to runway 25 and continuing onto a left base leg. The track then showed a left hook shape, consistent with a spiral (see figure 1 below).

Figure 1: Radar path showing track south and over the runway

A witness, who was a commercial pilot, reported that he was listening to O88’s common traffic advisory frequency while on his bicycle leaving the airport. He heard a transmission on the radio stating “experimental biplane, engine out.” He looked up and observed the accident airplane flying from the north on a southerly heading and stated that it passed over the airport at midfield. The airplane turned onto a left downwind leg for runway 25 at an estimated altitude of about 1,000 ft above ground level (agl). The airplane then banked left, followed by a “a total loss of control” and, within 10 seconds, it impacted the ground. The witness stated that he could hear the engine and thought it sounded normal. The witness added that the pilot could have said “simulated engine-out,” but he could not recall.

Another witness observed the airplane at a normal pattern altitude with the tail lower than he normally would see with other airplanes. A witness located at a nearby golf course stated that he observed the airplane enter a left bank about 750 to 1,000 ft agl, making several spirals before disappearing on the horizon. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe accident airplane was a two-seat biplane equipped with tricycle landing gear. The airplane had dual controls installed and could be flown from both the forward and aft seats. The pilots purchased the airplane from the builder on November 2, 2022. The maintenance records from the prior owner were located in the pilots’ hangar; there were no records from after the purchase. The last annual inspection was recorded as being completed on March 13, 2022, at a tachometer time of 511.2 hours. Thereafter, a pre-buy inspection was performed on June 28, 2022, at 515.4 hours.

Through the records and tachometer reading, it was determined that the airplane had accrued a total time of 543.9 hours at the time of the accident.

The build manuals depicted a trim tab system incorporating a McKenzie Vernier control, which was not installed on the accident airplane. Photographs of the installed trim system were shared with the airplane’s builder, who confirmed that the system shown did not match the configuration he originally installed. The timing and origin of the modification could not be determined since the airplane’s logbooks were only maintained up to the point of sale and contained no subsequent maintenance entries.

A 40-second video recovered from the pilot’s iPad depicted one of the pilots, presumably having made a recording for the previous owner. The video, recorded on January 18, 2023, showed the pilot narrating, “here is what we found,” while manipulating the right trim tab up and down. He remarked, “see how much that moves,” before inspecting the left trim tab in the same manner, noting, “that’s stiff.” He then returned to the right trim tab, again demonstrating its movement, and stated his belief that this was “what the problem was,” describing how it “just started oscillating … throwing the elevator up and down.” He concluded the video by stating that he had found the issue and planned to fix it. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATIONInformation gathered from local weather stations indicated an average wind from about 255° at 10 kts gusting to 15 kts. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe accident airplane was a two-seat biplane equipped with tricycle landing gear. The airplane had dual controls installed and could be flown from both the forward and aft seats. The pilots purchased the airplane from the builder on November 2, 2022. The maintenance records from the prior owner were located in the pilots’ hangar; there were no records from after the purchase. The last annual inspection was recorded as being completed on March 13, 2022, at a tachometer time of 511.2 hours. Thereafter, a pre-buy inspection was performed on June 28, 2022, at 515.4 hours.

Through the records and tachometer reading, it was determined that the airplane had accrued a total time of 543.9 hours at the time of the accident.

The build manuals depicted a trim tab system incorporating a McKenzie Vernier control, which was not installed on the accident airplane. Photographs of the installed trim system were shared with the airplane’s builder, who confirmed that the system shown did not match the configuration he originally installed. The timing and origin of the modification could not be determined since the airplane’s logbooks were only maintained up to the point of sale and contained no subsequent maintenance entries.

A 40-second video recovered from the pilot’s iPad depicted one of the pilots, presumably having made a recording for the previous owner. The video, recorded on January 18, 2023, showed the pilot narrating, “here is what we found,” while manipulating the right trim tab up and down. He remarked, “see how much that moves,” before inspecting the left trim tab in the same manner, noting, “that’s stiff.” He then returned to the right trim tab, again demonstrating its movement, and stated his belief that this was “what the problem was,” describing how it “just started oscillating … throwing the elevator up and down.” He concluded the video by stating that he had found the issue and planned to fix it. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONThe accident site was located about 2,615 ft from the approach end of runway 25. The wreckage was distributed over about 45 ft on a true heading of 350°. The nose was pointed on a median true heading of about 20°. The first identified pieces of debris were paint chips and an air scoop from the left side fuselage. The furthest wreckage pieces were large splinters of wood from the two-bladed propeller.

The fuselage came to rest upright with both lower wings attached at their respective roots. The upper wings remained attached but had partially collapsed onto the lower wings. The lower right wing sustained crush damage over the inboard 44 inches from resting on the landing gear, with additional aft damage to the outboard leading edge. The upper right wing’s outboard leading edge and underside showed aft and upward crushing. Internal inspection revealed fractured and loose ribs. The lower right aileron remained attached at the outboard fitting; the inboard fitting was broken, but the control rods stayed connected. The upper aileron was attached at the outboard end and disconnected inboard. The aileron interconnect tube was buckled but remained attached at both ends. Control tubes continued through the outboard lower bellcrank and remained continuous to the cockpit.

The lower left wing showed crush damage over the inboard 56 inches from resting on the gear. The aft section near the aileron was bent downward about five inches, and the outboard two feet of the lower wing had additional damage. The underside of the upper left wing displayed aft deformation, and the internal ribs were fractured and splintered. Both upper and lower ailerons remained attached, and the control rods and tubes were intact through to the cockpit interconnect tube.

The fuselage exhibited crush damage aft, right-aft, and upward from the firewall to the aft bulkhead behind the pilot’s seat, compromising cockpit space. The empennage, vertical stabilizer, and rudder remained largely intact. Both horizontal stabilizers were severely deformed downward and aft at the inboard ends and bent slightly upward outboard. The left stabilizer fractured at the aft tube near a wire attach fitting. The left elevator was attached and bent downward about 22 inches outboard; its balance weight remained in place. The right elevator was attached, but its balance weight hung downward.

Rudder and elevator cables were continuous from the cockpit to their fittings. The rudder horn moved freely with no damage to the stops. Elevator movement was restricted, which appeared to be the result of forward structure deformation. Slight rubbing was noted on the rudder’s left side fabric, with a corresponding mark on the adjacent left elevator, consistent with contact.

The left trim tab remained attached at its surfaces, and the control rod was continuous from the fuselage bellcrank. The right trim tab sheared off the piano hinge and came to rest under the elevator, yet remained connected to the bellcranks and was continuous to the fuselage bellcrank (see figure 2 below).

Figure 2: Trim tabs on the horizontal stabilizers

Neither trim tab moved freely. The cockpit trim control, folded...