Accident Details
Probable Cause and Findings
The failure of the tail boom structure due to cyclic torsion overloading as of a result of flutter in the empennage. The reason for the flutter could not be determined.
Aircraft Information
Registered Owner (Current)
Analysis
On July 22, 2023, about 1600 central daylight time, an Alisport Srl Silent 2 Electro glider, N64JG, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Wallis, Texas. The pilot was not injured. The glider was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.
According to the pilot, after completing a cross-country flight, he set up his final glide at 79 kts to descend from 6,000 ft. About 4,000 ft while in straight-and-level flight, he experienced a severe vibration and shaking of the glider. The pilot stated that the glider did not sustain a bird strike or encounter severe turbulence. The pilot slowed the glider, fearing elevator flutter, and deployed the spoilers to slow down. Upon reaching an airspeed around 60 kts, the vibration stopped. The pilot verified glider control and slowly increased the airspeed, at which time the vibration returned. About 2 miles from his gliderport, the pilot again slowed the glider and proceeded for a straight-in landing. The landing was uneventful, and the gilder rolled to a stop. After exiting the glider, the pilot noticed the composite tail boom structure was cracked in multiple locations (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Tail boom structure cracks
The damaged tail boom structure was sectioned from the glider and sent to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Materials Laboratory for examination. According to the NTSB Materials Laboratory, the fuselage skin was made from fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials with both glass fiber and carbon fiber fabric reinforcement. The fuselage skin was constructed of two halves (left and right) that were spliced together at the upper and lower sides. At each splice location, the skin layers butted together, and strips of glass-fiber reinforced fabric were bonded to the interior surfaces to form single-strap butt joints.
Skin cracks were located about 20 inches forward of the vertical stabilizer and were oriented about 45° relative to the transverse plane on both the left and right side. Additionally, longitudinal cracks were observed on the upper and lower sides of the skin. The 45° cracks intersected the longitudinal crack at the upper side of the skin, and on the lower side the 45° cracks were separated from the longitudinal crack.
A portion of the upper skin containing the longitudinal crack, and a section of the upper splice was cut from the remainder of the fuselage skin. On the interior side, a portion of the strap had a lighter appearance, and the change in color was consistent with a disbond between the strap and the skin.
Scanning electron microscope images showed all fibers were observed in bundles, consistent with fabric construction. No evidence of glass fiber roving was observed, including the resin pocket between the strap and the skin.
According to the glider flight manual, the normal operating airspeed range is between 40 – 81 kts, the design maneuvering airspeed is 81 kts, and the never exceed airspeed in still air is 118 kts.
Availability of information about the construction and various test and maintenance procedures was limited due to the glider manufacturer and subsequent companies no longer being in operation.
Data Source
Data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). For more information on this event, visit the NTSB Records Search website. NTSB# CEN23LA319